Re: [Amendment] Minor Procedural Change to Patronisation for Moderational Clearance
Originally Posted by
Radzeer
The only good alternative I see to this proposal if the applicant himself reveals the patron that his moderation history contains a warning in the past six months (as per #1). A member's moderation history is strictly his own. I never liked when random citizens jumped in to ask about moderation history in the discussion thread.
Under normal circumstances, the applicant should tell the member that he would not pass the moderation requirement before anything is posted. If applicants are not aware of this, the Curator should catch this. The easiest way would be to report the OP of the application with the request to get moderation clearance. This could be then easily answered by any moderator online at the moment.
This could probably be the best suggestion to this. Although I agree that this is for the patron to check, one cannot really expect everyone of them to follow the entire checklist. So the fact about the curator reporting the OP should do the trick - inform the curator about the eligibility and not reveal anything publicly.