So are terrorism fatalities post 9-11. I suppose you would be happy for the far-right and Jihadis to get on with their business too? If a serial killer killed 5 people would you let it ride because it is minuscule? YOu seem to be quite content that someone died over a minuscule number of contraband cigarettes. Perhaps one law for incompetent cops and other for everyone else is the proposition. No-one need die over cigarettes. End of. Smoking kills, laws pertaining to their use should not lead to the same result.
We are not talking about borderline cases here where a policeman may or may not have caught a half glimpse or a shadow and made a split -second decision.They will no doubt far outnumber the killings noted here. We are talking about total and utter incompetence. You may have noticed that I have not mentioned race being a factor in any of my posts because the common denominator is a lack of competence.
Another example, ( you say minuscule number of cases, I seem to have to have no trouble finding them).
An unarmed person , Eric Harris killed by an idiot, who can't tell the difference between a taser and a handgun.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...n-for-a-taser/
As an aside, though off topic as I am concerned about incompetence rather than procedure; you post something about there being 625 fatalities already ( more since the report) this year and you don't recognise a problem? AS I said before, "USA, better than ISIS" isn't good enough for a first world country. 1 person was killed by police in 2014 and 0 in 2013. English police reportedly fired guns a total of three times in all of 2013, with zero reported fatalities.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/p...oting-someone/