-
October 12, 2007, 06:04 AM
#181
-
October 12, 2007, 07:21 AM
#182
Flame Imperishable
Re: Ideas thread?
The file by itself is very good. It needed some extra conditions, but that was all, it was very well done overall. BUT the thing is that our existing traits/ancs do the very same thing, only in a bit more refined and simple manner. So there is actually no need to change them.
The good news is that motivated by your file I checked some triggers again and I corrected a missing condition. Thank you!
-
October 16, 2007, 09:20 PM
#183
Re: Ideas thread?
Just an idea for the export_descr_buildings concerning Rohan’s recruits of rohan cavspear, rohan cavspear fiefdom and rohan cavspear outland units. At the moment Rohan ends up with three units of Rohan Spears (rohan cavspear, rohan cavspear fiefdom and rohan cavspear outland) the only difference being the number of men in a unit.
My idea is this:
recruit "rohan cavspear" 2 requires factions { huns, } and hidden_resource rohan
recruit "rohan cavspear fiefdom" 2 requires factions { huns, } and hidden_resource freefolk and not hidden_resource rohan
recruit "rohan cavspear outland" 2 requires factions { huns, } and not hidden_resource freefolk and not hidden_resource rohan
This way there should be only one unit of Rohan Spears to recruit.
-
October 17, 2007, 07:36 AM
#184
Re: Ideas thread?
Yes, but the reason why all three are available - in addition to options for the player with limited funds - is that they can all be retrained. Splitting them up as you suggest would mean the player having to track down which settlements he can retrain each at - and that was disliked very much when our USV (unit-size variation) system was active.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules