Page 1 of 26 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 501

Thread: Young Bloods IV

  1. #1
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Young Bloods IV

    Young Bloods IV

    Co-Admins: joerock22 & JWANT

    Due to the recent interest shown by new players in TATW hotseating, JWANT and I decided to start up a new Young Bloods game. This is for players who are new or relatively new to TATW hotseating, and preferably hotseating in general. Complete rules will be posted later, but for now we plan on having this be a Good vs. Evil game. Please post if you are interested in joining, and what faction you might like.


    Map




    Factions

    Gondor: Jadli
    Rohan: DontTreadOnMe777
    Dale: Adanedhel (formerly Benek1818)
    Silvan Elves: pontyak
    Mordor: pulkownik
    Isengard: Ramsay Snow (took over on turn 25)
    Rhun: Egyptian_Viking


    Rules

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Administrative:

    • Long campaign
    • Manage all settlements
    • M/M Difficulty


    General

    • You may reload your turn as many times as you want
    • Turns must be taken within 24 hours. Extensions available upon request, but please try not to be late every time
    • Please PM or VM the next player in line


    Territorial

    • Players cannot capture any settlement outlined in white (i.e. out of bounds area). There is no restriction on where armies and agents can move. So armies and agents can move into out of bounds areas, but may not capture any settlements there
    • Isengard’s northern border – South Tharbad is in bounds. North Tharbad is out of bounds


    Gameplay

    • Good vs. Evil
    • No Invasions
    • You may gift regions to another faction, but all units except one which appear as a result of the transfer must be disbanded immediately
    • No gifting settlements at risk of capture
    • No heroic victories
    • Battles against other players must be auto-resolved. Battles against the AI can be fought
    • Post screenshots of all battles against other players: deployment screen and results screen. I think this makes following a hotseat much more interesting. Note – you do not need to post screenshots for lopsided battles, i.e. 1,000 vs. 100, but please mention the battle in your post
    • No assassinations or sabotage. You may recruit assassins to act as (expensive) extra spies, but you may not use them for anything else
    • No surrounding armies with smaller stacks to deny a retreat. You are allowed to block bridges or river crossings
    • No mercenary transport ships
    • All crossings points of the Anduin are in play
    • Units defeated by a player coming after you in the turn order may not move or attack on your subsequent turn
    • The previous rule includes sieges – if defeated units retreat to a settlement and the enemy immediately lays siege, the defending army may not sally out on the turn immediately after the defeat, even if there are units inside the settlement which were not defeated. This is because the game engine prevents the sally where the defeated army comes later in the turn order
    • Bribing is allowed
    • Sallying from a settlement under siege is not allowed if it results in the settlement falling to the besieging force immediately thereafter (on your turn)
    • You are not allowed to lure an ambushing army a tile further to bring it in range of more of your forces
    • You are not allowed to siege a settlement for the sole purpose of denying a retreat into that settlement. You must instead allow the retreat and then siege the settlement
    • You may use siege engines (ballista, catapult, etc.) to attack a settlement immediately instead of sieging for a turn first


    Buildings

    • No destroying any buildings if the settlement is at risk of capture
    • Exterminating settlements is not allowed. You may sack or occupy
    • On the turn you capture an enemy settlement, you are only allowed to destroy inns and cultural buildings. This rule stays in effect until you have held a captured settlement for 3 turns
    • After you hold a captured settlement for 3 turns, buildings can be destroyed without restriction (provided the settlement is not at risk of capture)


    Spies

    • Whether a spy may open the gates of a settlement depends on the size of the settlement’s garrison. If a settlement is defended by 720+ elves, 900+ men, or 1500+ orcs, then spies may NOT open the gates. If a settlement is defended by fewer than this number, then spies may open the gates without restriction
    • Note – Isengard must have 1500 soldiers in a settlement before it is safe from spies, even if some of those soldiers are dunlandings (men). This is because the standard unit size for Isengard is 250 across the board. Rhun, on the other hand, falls under the 900 man category because its standard unit size is 150
    • The purpose of this rule is to allow players to defend their settlement without fear of losing their garrison due to spies. Its justification is that settlement with more defenders have better surveillance and it would be harder for spies to operate. I also want to keep the rule simple, which is the reason for the hard limit. So basically if you defend a settlement with 6 full units worth of troops, you are safe from spies
    • Spies may open the gates against the Rebels (AI) without restriction


    Rules are open to change based on a vote by a majority of players



    Map Updates

    Turn 11 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwL...ew?usp=sharing
    Turn 25 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwL...ew?usp=sharing
    Last edited by joerock22; May 09, 2015 at 07:35 PM. Reason: map update

  2. #2
    Arrow2daknee's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    2,858

    Default Re: Young Bloods III (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...oungbloods-III

    Shouldn't this be Youngbloods IV?

    Can I be co-co admin ploz?

  3. #3
    Jadli's Avatar The Fallen God
    Gaming Emeritus

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    8,528

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Gondor please

  4. #4
    Jadli's Avatar The Fallen God
    Gaming Emeritus

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    8,528

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    I have been playing Westeros hotseats for few moths already, but i have few questions about TATW hotseasting:

    1) Are there any economic or financial changes to vanilla, because most of castles and towns here are totally "undeveloped" ?
    2) How many turns does HS like this usually takes? Im interested in this, because it will affect the way i play. If its "just" around 40 turns then there is no big need to develop and upragde cities, but if those HS are longer, then its one of the most important things here, i believe.

  5. #5
    Adanedhel's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,879

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Finally! I would like to play Dale. It would be my first, serious HS. A friend of mine would also play. His first pick would be Silvan Elves, but if they're taken, he'll play High Elves.

  6. #6
    Adanedhel's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,879

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    I'm looking at the map now and see that HE, Dwarves, Eriador and Orcs are not in play. Is that right?

  7. #7
    General Dragon.'s Avatar Champion of Dragons
    Gaming Emeritus

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    3,768

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jadli View Post
    I have been playing Westeros hotseats for few moths already, but i have few questions about TATW hotseasting:

    1) Are there any economic or financial changes to vanilla, because most of castles and towns here are totally "undeveloped" ?
    2) How many turns does HS like this usually takes? Im interested in this, because it will affect the way i play. If its "just" around 40 turns then there is no big need to develop and upragde cities, but if those HS are longer, then its one of the most important things here, i believe.

    Most town are undeveloped in TATW too, except the important ones like Barad-dur, Minas Tirith and so on. However in TATW there are more resources on the map, so the economy is a little bit bigger.
    A hotseats takes as many times it needs to take. If someone gets the upperhand very early for example with Mordor then it will be finished early. However if there is a balance between the powers of factions, then it can take more than 40 turns to end the hotseat.

  8. #8
    Jadli's Avatar The Fallen God
    Gaming Emeritus

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    8,528

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    ok, thanks, im veteran in singleplayer TATW soo i know how it all works, i just wanted ask how is it in hotseats

  9. #9

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    I'd like to play an evil faction. Rhűn preferably.

  10. #10
    KhalFrodo's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    496

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Harad if possible

  11. #11
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Benek1818 View Post
    I'm looking at the map now and see that HE, Dwarves, Eriador and Orcs are not in play. Is that right?
    That is correct, for now. Depending on player interest, these factions could be included. But a fair warning: hotseats with more than 7-8 factions tend to take very long to play, and people get bored and leave. So if there are more than 7-8 players interested, it would be better to start 2 games instead of 1 large one.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Hi, I'm the one who is interested in playing Silvan Elves but if they're not available anymore I'll play Rohan.

  13. #13
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    No word from NoldorinElves, so I gave SE to pontyak. Also, due to player interest and balancing concerns, I removed Harad as a playable faction. It is now 4 Good vs. 3 Evil, but the Evil factions are generally more powerful.

    KhalFrodo will have first choice among the 3 remaining factions. Then we just need 2 more players.

  14. #14
    KhalFrodo's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    496

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Hm, since Harad is not here I am choosing Gondor

  15. #15
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Sorry, but Gondor was already chosen (post #3, before you made a choice).

  16. #16
    Jadli's Avatar The Fallen God
    Gaming Emeritus

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    8,528

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Im now looking at map, and it seems that both Osgiliath setlements are rebels ( in vanilla they were divided to Mordor and Gondor i believe), am i right? And if yes, are there any other map changes to vanilla?
    Last edited by Jadli; January 04, 2015 at 11:00 AM.

  17. #17
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jadli View Post
    Im now looking at map, and it seems that both Osgiliath setlements are rebels ( in vanilla they were divided to Mordor and Gondor i believe), am i right? And if yes, are there any other map changes to vanilla?
    There are no map changes to vanilla, so W.O. is Gondor's and E.O. is Mordor's at the start. That map isn't 100% accurate but it is the easiest for me to edit. You'll also notice that south Tharbad doesn't appear at all (north of Dunland). Isengard is allowed to capture South Tharbad, but is not allowed to capture North Tharbad. We always set that border at the river.

  18. #18
    themzr's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,101
    Tournaments Joined
    1
    Tournaments Won
    0

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    They call me Yung Poseidon on Twitter. I can join this right???

  19. #19

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    Quote Originally Posted by themzr View Post
    They call me Yung Poseidon on Twitter. I can join this right???
    Join the dark side. It's plenty of fun

  20. #20

    Default Re: Young Bloods IV (new hotseat, multiple factions open!)

    @Joerock22 You took away Harad, but why take away the rebel town North East of Harad? I wanted to take it

Page 1 of 26 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •