Well, it is just either mechanized infantry or armor anyway; US during WWII had "light" and "heavy" armor divisions, which the only difference between those two were ratio between infantry and tank.
Well, it is just either mechanized infantry or armor anyway; US during WWII had "light" and "heavy" armor divisions, which the only difference between those two were ratio between infantry and tank.
Also a little known fact was the sheer amount of T34 and others of these tanks that the Germans shipped back to Germany. They either tried to modify them or tried to use them wherever tanks were needed. The T34 was really good for its weight category especially if they could be mass produced easily.
but the Wehrmacht never deployed many T-34s on the eastern front because german gunners identified targets according to silhouette and pak-artillery shot at everything which even closely resembled a T-34. However they made good use of them as towing vehicles without turret.
HATE SPEECH ISN'T REAL
I recall they used it as some sort of auxiliary tank. Like how the Soviets used British and American tanks to support some lesser fronts. But it was a waste of fuel so the Germans didn't really use the T34 for this good reason but they had plenty tucked away in armories and such.
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” Benjamin Franklin
Excellent. If I had dug into my German AFVs of World War II encyclopedia I would have seen this, laziness on my part.
I have a myth I would like cleared up, or simply enlightened. Last year when the ramming frenzy hit full strength in War Thunder everyone kept saying "It was a legit tactic by the Soviet air force". I have done some digging and have found instances where pilots have used their props to sever tails and ailerons (by many nations) but was this an actual combat option utilized by the Soviets? Beyond aircraft, armaments and the fact that they often flew in much smaller groups or even solo compared to the Luftwaffe, I know absolutely ZERO about Soviet air tactics in WWII.
I think rather it was fresh Siberian divisions arriving from the East that 'saved', more likely helped to save, Moscow in 1941.
Probably you mean though that the myth is that it was the snipers alone who did all the work?
In the 30's Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were very close and helped the development of modern military theories.
IMO 'Blitzkrieg' itself is a kind of myth. As in its just a general name for the new style of German warfare of the late 30's and 40's, and not that its a 'myth' as in a fictional story.
"Nobody is right, but historians are more right than others"
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” Benjamin Franklin
The IS2 was the greatest tank of World War II.
The Glorious IS2 sees your heresy and obliterates it with the holy firepower of it's sacred 122mm cannon. You are redeemed of your sins by it's mere presence, but nevertheless are taken to the afterlife by it's justice.
Japan surrendered thanks to the sheer amount of surprise during Operation August Storm
It's true that the Red Army was at the gates of Korea but the main factor of the surrender was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the US. Also, the ''rather you than them'' mentality that the Japanese government held during the final month of WW2.
Knowledge is a deadly friend, if no one sets the rules. The fate of all mankind I see, is in the hands of fools - King Crimson's Epitaph.
תחי מדינת ישראל
The Battle of Prochorowka, it was reported the *swan song* of the German Panzers and a great victory for the brave soldiers of the Red Army who destroyed hundreds German tanks (even by ramming them) in their assaults on the 2nd SS Panzer Corps.
It was a disastrous defeat for the Red Army.
Invasio Barbarorum: Ruina Roma Development Leader - Art made by Joar -Visit my Deviantart: http://gaiiten.deviantart.com/
So disastrous, that the Germans failed to take their objectives and retreated!
Do not mistake the tactical Battle of Prochorowka with the strategical battle of Kursk
Invasio Barbarorum: Ruina Roma Development Leader - Art made by Joar -Visit my Deviantart: http://gaiiten.deviantart.com/
I'm not The Soviet Counterattackmay have been thrown back, but at the least they left behind too many burnt out tanks for the Germans to advance through :p
Last edited by DarthShizNit; January 22, 2015 at 04:49 AM.
Myth: The T-34 was the best tank of WWII and a war winning design.
This is imo, one of the most common myths regarding WWII, when it comes down to equipment. The T-34 featured some nice ideas and was cheap, that is undeniable, but it's abiliy has been elevated far beyond it's actual capabilities both by the Russians, but also by the Germans as it was a convinient explination for their defeat (the enemy had better stuff)
The T-34 was produced in an insane amount of more than 54.000 tanks, but out of this production some 44.900 tanks were irrecoverably lost by the end of the war. That's a lost of more than 80% of total production.
Also it's a myth that German tanks were incapable of fighting against the Soviet tanks during the period of 1942-1943 when the T-34 started to make it's impact. A large part of Soviet AFV casualties were caused by the then standard German 50mm gun. Sure, the 50mm as an inadequate weapon as the Germans quickly realized, but it still managed to get a lot of kills. This is likely due to poor design choices (especially in the T-34) that allowed German crews to get off a lot more shots and come a lot closer than they would later in the war when the Soviets started adressing these critical inefficiencies (lack of radio, and tactical incompetence)
It should be noted that the Soviet production of AFV (all types of tanks, spg, etc) totalled some 99.000 - around twice as much as the total German production.
You can of cause argue that the T-34 was a war winning design on the strategic level as the Soviets could turn out as many as they did, but given it's actual performances it is really stretching it call it the best tank and I beg to differ that there were a lot of other circumstances that played into the Soviet defeat of the Wehrmacht in the East.
Last edited by SPECTREtm; January 22, 2015 at 10:52 AM.