Anyone else sympathetic to the European far-right?

[wilpuri]

Source for the underlined parts? It makes no sense that immigrants create more jobs, since a lot of them prefer to live on welfare.

You forget the asylum industry. Its a big business for private companies to house refugees and collect fat pay checks from the state.

[Denny Crane!]

You forget the asylum industry. Its a big business for private companies to house refugees and collect fat pay checks from the state.

Oh jeez wilpuri still super props for putting me onto familjen. You are probably the craziest person going I'd visit in any foreign country but only if in your case if we could do the the ice cold sauna jump.

But what about the asylum industry before delving into anything else?

[wilpuri]

Well in Sweden for example there are several large private corporations making big profits from that country's insane asylum policy (such as Attendo Care). With c. 90 000 new mouths to feed and house every year and the tax payer footing the bill, well, no recession for them.

[youngfool]

Its inevitable, and coincidently as wilpuri's catch phase suggests 'it gets worse'. No one race or culture can rule forever, the rise of far-right European movements in my predicament marks the demise of Anglo-Saxons domination.
This phenomenon is not unique, its happens throughout human history. Nations and states flourish and prosper when they open their gates indiscriminately and treat those as equals with respect, until they turn otherwise that is...

[Denny Crane!]

Well in Sweden for example there are several large private corporations making big profits from that country's insane asylum policy (such as Attendo Care). With c. 90 000 new mouths to feed and house every year and the tax payer footing the bill, well, no recession for them.

HUh that is an odd move. We've went the opposite way with the Care in the Community bill which is the exact opposite. Seems unusual for the UK to be making the progressive move over a Scandinavian country.

[Maiar93]

It's got to happen at some point, turns out we're(scandis) not perfect either. Or maybe the UK is just beginning to catch up.

[Denny Crane!]

Im assuming CitC is better, it seems riddled with problems abd expense but ultimately I guess less problems than institutionalisations

[Eisenherz]

I am quite sympathetic to the European right wing. I don't agree with needless violence but I also think that if European nations are to survive then they need to unite and preserve their peoples and cultures. Anything less would be tragic. I vehemently oppose globalism as it will inevitably lead to corruption of the like that humanity has never yet known and the destruction of indigenes, the world over.
I am an American but I've spent a decade in Europe, I have many close friends and close relatives in the UK and in Germany and I know that many folks are apprehensive about their future amidst wide-spread immigration of unassimilable and aggressive people.

[Mayer]

in particular muslims

i mean just look at this

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Is this still germany or begins here the islamic state?

[Thorn777]

^I think they are a similar sympthom of a string of problems that popularize "the European far-right". Hell, I think they are a part of the European far-right.

[Mayer]

If your definition of far-right is the classical, i.e. all-hating reactionaries (fundamentalist abrahamic monotheists or supporters of a non-enlightened absolutist monarchy which is divinely legitimized and does not restrict the privileges of the aristocracy and the church or prohibit slavery and serfdom) then i agree.

But then nationalism would have to be classified as a left-wing republican ideology.

[Hobbes]

Indeed, it's better classified as idiocy.

[Heathen Hammer]

Indeed, it's better classified as idiocy.

Why? Because it contradicts your own views?

[Hobbes]

Because it's irrational and destructive.

[Basil II the B.S]

And communism is an ideology based on hate an violence. Yet you support it.
Talking about rationality and destruction.
And maybe hypocrisy as well.

[Hobbes]

And communism is an ideology based on hate an violence. Yet you support it.

It ain't.

[Basil II the B.S]

What about that violent revolution against the evil bourgeoise Marx was talking about?

[6th Vigil]

And communism is an ideology based on hate an violence. Yet you support it.
Talking about rationality and destruction.
And maybe hypocrisy as well.

Communism is just one class against another class as opposed to nationalism which is one nationality against another nationality. They're two sides of the same coin and both destructive at their extremes.

[Hobbes]

What about that violent revolution against the evil bourgeoise Marx was talking about?

That is not the basis of it. The entire concept is based on analysis of the conditions present in societies dominated by a specific mode of production. Violence will be a necessity because no one is going to just hand over his property to his workers, for example. Should the working class demand such things, don't you think that the capitalists, with their support from the state, would act against it?

[Heathen Hammer]

Because it's irrational and destructive.

How is pursuing your nation's interests irrational and destructive?