Currently my laptop cant run Crusader Kings II so I was wondering what the difference between the first and second are, along which is better.
Currently my laptop cant run Crusader Kings II so I was wondering what the difference between the first and second are, along which is better.
having not played the original i can not say for sure which is better.
but i can say that CKII is worth the money spent and i am a demanding customer...
the vanilla game itself is worth it and if you can get it with DLC`s on sale, great.
i would recomend Sword of Islam, the Republic and Old Gods. all opens up new forms of government/game-play and extends replayability.
Sunset Invasion is BS, Aztecs attcking Europa. Bah!
Legacy of Rome is to limited and loopsided in scope it is only usefull(slightly) when playing Byzantium.
Hr. Alf han hugg til han var mod, Han sto i femten Ridderes Blod; Så tog han alle de Kogger ni Og sejlede dermed til Norge fri. Og der kom tidende til Rostock ind, Der blegned saa mangen Rosenkind. Der græd Enker og der græd Børn, Dem hadde gjort fattig den skadelige Ørn.
Anders Sørensen Vedel
Crusader kings 2 demands very low specs , i dont understand how it cant run it. How old is your computer?
Also ck2 is definitely better.
CK II way better , but the hardcore fans still love the first one too.
I could run the demo, but not efficiently.
DxDiag.txt
Processor Intel Pentium T4500 / 2.3 GHz ( Dual-Core )
Memory 3.0 GB / 6.0 GB (max)
Hard Drive 320.0 GB
Operating System Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Edition
Display Type 15.6 in TFT active matrix
Max Resolution ( HD )
Graphics Processor Intel GMA 4500MHD Dynamic Video Memory Technology 5.0
Optical Drive DVD±RW (±R DL)
I just stay in independent realms map mode and it stops lagging. It really only lags when on terrain mode for me, and I think my specs on my current pc kind of suck anyway.
Rep me and I'll rep you back.
UNDER THE PATRONAGE OF THE KING POSTER AKAR
It's frigging awesome.