Anyone notice that all the Barbarian factions seem to have huge muscular men? All the Roman units and Greek units have shorter skinnier men. This is not realistic at all! Also, it seems that most of the Roman/Greek units have hair loss problems or are bald.
I have not played Rome 2 yet but do the Romans look shorter than the Barbarian units on the battlefield? Not counting the Beserkers who would probably be taller.
http://www.gameranx.com/img/13-Feb/t...ni-faction.jpg
Look how huge and muscular they are while all the Roman units look skinny. I doubt that in this time all the Barbarian men were huge and muscular, infact the Roman Soldiers would have been bigger if you read this.
http://www.geocities.ws/racial_reality/romans.html
Romans had a heavy build. Don't see many statues with hairloss issues in those pictures either. Roman Legions also placed emphasis on how large a man is for recruiting, you also had to be at least 5'10 to join the Legion, this was after the Marian Reforms. They still placed more emphasis on the size of a man than height but not many short men are huge so I doubt there were any men shorter than 5'8 in the Roman Legion. The Marian reforms were in 107 BC and the Empire had regions mostly in Southern Europe and parts of Southern France so these reforms were not because taller conquered barbarian men could now join the legions, the height requirement was not because of them.
I went through a lot of archeological data concerning the height of ancient european men and I concluded that it is this.
Roman (Italy only): 5'5-5'7 on average, average heights would vary between 5'5-5'7 depending on the city. The average height in Pompeii for men was 5'5 but it was a poor lower class city.
Celtic: 5'7-5'9 depending on the settlement.
Germanic:5'8-5'10 depending on the settlement. All Barbarians lived in little primitive hut villages/towns anyway with wooden buildings and straw huts. All they ever used for Architecture was wood because they didn't know how to build anything else.