"They" being the welfare parasites and undesirables such as the Negros and the Muslims? Yeah. That's some pretty racist garbage there. Also "Die sächsische steigt" (The Saxon rises, for those who don't speak German). Yeah, that's racist too. And of course, calling all the non-Saxons "Bastards". That's like, racist as balls there.
There is no single defined model of "socialism" which you can criticize. You can criticize the concept of socialism, the ownership of means of production by the proleteriat, or you can critize 20th century experience of "communism". But you can not spit on the concept of socialism without understanding its framework.
A 10 year old who goes and says "socialism promotes laziness" is the stupidest thing to read. What is this socialism this person is referring to? Can we say the Paris Commune, the USSR, Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea are the "same" experiences? No, they are all very diverse. They dont even fit the requirements of a materialist socialism interpretation. Therefore, most of the comments in this thread are annoyingly cliche and uneducated.
When one is to critize socialism, the person has to adress the materialist framework, the philosophy behind it. WHICH BTW, neither requires people to be "good-hearted awesome nongreedy ubermensch" nor has anything to do with promotion of laziness.
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
Not only is this false (look at the numbers, most black people usually vote democrat regardless. Al Gore got 90% of the black vote in 2000, and John Kerry got 88% in 2004. Also, before you edited it out, you mentioned the evils of multiculturism and race mixing. Plus you repeatedly mention the "white race" as somehow being oppressed. Which is funny, because the white race doesn't know the first thing about what oppression is.Negros voted for Obama simply because he's on of them.
Welfare parasites. Really? Have you ever been in a situation where you had to go on welfare and foodstamps? Newsflash: Nobody, save for a small minority of druggies and the like, who goes on welfare, want to go on welfare. I take offense to calling people who need government assistance parisites, mostly because my family is on food stamps, and because I can see very clearly you don't know the first thing about the lives of the poor .By the way, the only ones that think I am a racist are the welfare parasites and illegal immigrants.
And you still don't believe you are racist? Really? The white mans working hands. Do you even read what you are saying?All they want are hand-outs taken from the white mans working hands.
Bull ****ing ****. Keep on creating these false excuses in your mind for being racist. They don't hate you. Illegal immigrants, at least in the US, come because they can't afford to get here legally, and the wait time is literally years long. All they want is an oppurtunity for them and their families to have a chance at a good life. They don't want to mooch off the government and thinking they do shows you really don't understand their situation. Illegal immigrants, again, at least in the US, probably work harder than than most Americans do. If hard work really determined your wealth and success, that illegal immigrant mowing the lawn down the street would be the richest and most successful person alive.They hate us.
Jesus ****ing christ. You are making up these things in your head. Nobody is teaching you to hate yourselves. Nobody is trying to "steal" your jobs. Nobody is targeting you.If you think us Whites are just going to lay down while everyone promotes hatred towards us, then you're wrong.
If you think we're going to let them take what we worked for, you're wrong.
If you think we're going to let them control our banks and jobs, you're wrong.
The white race is being marginalized, being targeted.
Everyday we're taught to hate ourselves, because of the past.
That time is gone, we don't need to apologize, and we don't need to hate ourselves.
I'm tired of this. You are nothing short of a racist scumbag.We don't want to mix cultures, we don't want lazy criminals in our lands, and we won't let them throw us out.
You are beyond hopeless. Please check in at the nearest mental asylum immediately. I mean seriously, you would fit well in the KKK if you lived in America.Now, in what way is any of this racist? Who in the world would want their race to be marginalized and taught to hate itself?
^What are you talking about? He asked a question, I gave the textbook answer. I am not criticizing anything, and for one thing, you have the definition of Socialism completely wrong. You are confusing it with the concept of Communism, which is the ownership of production by the proletariat like you said. Socialism is the transition between the point of when scarcity is eliminated through means of production, and the seizure of these assets by the proletariat. This transition period is the focus of many books and leaders because they all have various of interpretations of how this transition should occur. Whether through an elite vanguard, the people, or just one man. There's also a difference between how each idealist chooses to utilize the means of production, and of course the fact that the revolution it supposed to occur globally as opposed to nationally. But you know all of this, so why quote me as if I'm providing false information?
The problem with socialism is that it forgets that the individual is the key. Socialism is a collectivist ideology (obviously), and as a follower of Mill, in particular On Liberty, I am opposed to it.
Sorry that I did not clarify. That "you" was not directed towards you. I was actually trying to refer to a lot of people who post in this thread.
Things like this:
How is that relevant? What kind of an arguement is that? I am a follower of Mill so socialism is wrong. This is ridiculous.
*Socialism is not an ideology
*I dont see how socialism can exist without a Marxist framework, which you are not even referring to
I love how he says, "on particular liberty" as if socialism has a set of laws, one of them being gettinf rid of "liberty".
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
Typical, and expected behavior. Cursing, insulting, emotions all over the place. Crying about food stamps, looking for pity. All you do is prove what I believe to be correct.
Illegal immigrants, are just that. ILLEGAL. And should be thrown out as soon as soon as they're caught. I don't care if they're looking for jobs, or their family is starving, if they are here illegally, then they should be treated like what they are; Criminals.
The White Race, has always endeavored to bring the latest technologies, knowledge, and political ideas to the other races.
The White Race has made advances in scientific, medical, and mathematical fields that cannot be surpassed.
The White Race tried to help the other races to build, tried to bring education, and look what happened.
Absolutely nothing. The middle east: Arabs, Persians, and Pashtuns run around blowing everything up.
Asia: Communist Dictatorships and caste system governments dot the land.
South America: Poverty, sex-slave trafficking, out of control drugs, starving people everywhere, corrupt politicians.
Now tell me, where in Sweden does this happen? Where the immigrants go.
Where in Germany? where the immigrants go.
Where in Norway? Where the immigrants go.
That's a fact. And that is the problem. Germany isn't the problem, Sweden isn't, Norway isn't, it's the immigrants.
We've been patient, tried to accept others, but we don't get any appreciation for us letting them seek a better life. If they can't play by the rules, then they can go back.
There's no reason to let them stay, if all they're going to do is commit crimes, because that IS ALL THEY DO.
Müde von ihnen.
Sie stehlen.
Sie vergewaltigen.
Sie bringen illegale Drogen.
Tired of being hated throughout the world for being white, tired of being oppressed by these foreigners that come into the Rheinlande and try to change everything.
Don't you get it?
Don't you dare call me a racist, you do not know me personally and have no idea what I have done before.
Simply because of my blonde hair, blue eyes, and Nordic-Aryan physique people hate me. THAT is racism.
Last edited by Cor De Ferrum; March 22, 2013 at 09:15 PM. Reason: Expansion
Oh god, do you actually believe you are being called racist for being white? Don't you see it may have anything to do with the race theory you are telling us about?
God loves me, and He's monogamous. || Improve the world, start with yourself.
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
well the part about how all immigrants do is commit crime is wrong for starters. Also this "superior white race" which you keep talking about can be immigrants themselves, so I'm guessing only the brown people are criminals too?
the "tired of them, all they do is still rape and bring illegal drugs" is also blatantly false, and at the very best only discriminatory.
And I hope i'm not the only one who see's the irony in
followed by
.
"Oh man, i hate how everyone assumes since I'm white I think white people are better then everyone else, it's so unfair, also, white people are the only ones who can accomplish things"
odi et amo quare id faciam fortasse requiris / nescio sed fieri sentio et excrucior