Oh ****! We want wub face!

[Daily]

I like my wubs, discurages profanities which again leads to all sorts of benefits for the site .

I have become a much more fluent speaker in the arts of English after joining TWC. And not being able to here and there has really made me more refined as a human being.

[Evariste]

No one wants that. It breaks formatting.

[GrnEyedDvl]

No one wants that. It breaks formatting.

According to the poll, most people do want it.

[Raglan]

I think we should replace the wub face with one the says ' I'm clever because I'm swearing!'

[Pontifex Maximus]

Please no...

[Anduril248]

Apparently yes. i was always used to seeing the wub face it seems weird without it.....

[Evariste]

According to the poll, most people do want it.

34 people want it. How many people visit TWC on a given day? I have to imagine it's at least 75 or so.

[irishron]

122 have read this thread.
59 have voted.
Still a better percentage than US elections.

[GrnEyedDvl]

34 people want it. How many people visit TWC on a given day? I have to imagine it's at least 75 or so.

Thousands. We average about 200-250,000 page views a day not counting bots. I could probably pull request logs and see how many IP addresses total there are in a day, but there is no point in that. Most are not registered, and most of the ones that are registered do not vote. The only way to interpret the data is by who voted. Doing anything else on something like this is just skewing the sample.

That doesnt mean we will always do what the majority vote is, or ever for that matter. I am just pointing out that stating it way you put it above doesnt really prove or disprove anything. The only thing you can really say is that x number of people cared enough about the issue to vote.

122 have read this thread.
59 have voted.
Still a better percentage than US elections.

122 people that were both registered and logged in. If you are not registered, it cant list you there. And if you are registered but not logged in the same applies.

[Squid]

this. This is a test of broadcast system.

EDIT: As can be seen the has been restored. I just had to find the hack and port it.

[Baltic Warrior]

NO! you!

[Søren]

Voted no. The wub face is annoying because its height disrupts the spacing between lines.
Voted no. The wub face is ing annoying because its height disrupts the spacing between lines.
Voted no. The wub face is annoying because its height disrupts the spacing between lines.

Voted no. The wub face is annoying because its height disrupts the spacing between lines.
Voted no. The wub face is ****ing annoying because its height disrupts the spacing between lines.
Voted no. The wub face is annoying because its height disrupts the spacing between lines.

[Squid]

I've reverted this back to * to test if this is what has been causing the slow down the last couple of days.

[Magister Militum Flavius Aetius]

I agree the face was much better than "****" or such, it adds style to TWC, and looks better than a post full of asterisks.

[Arbitrary Crusader]

As oppose to a post full pink faces?

At least, you can get an idea with asterisk , yet you could do the same with smiley; however, I find it a bit more difficult at times.

Eh, not like my opionon is going to change it, and I guess I had add the asterisks in my own ****ing way.

[zznɟ ǝɥʇ]

As long as that's not bypassing the censor...

[Blatta Optima Maxima]

ing bull, I want the ing face back, for 's sake!

If you don't ing give it back, I'll spam the outta you typing by ing hand.

[Makrell]

let me note that the ass ****ing face is aweomse

[B-DizL]

I voted yes before realizing i could just type it. I always typed it before too just havent posted using any offensive language yet so hadnt notice the change.

That all comes down to tweaks of code with are understandably on the back burner.