Appeal 842 - Insulting others

[Sharpe's Company]

Claiming that races are genetically inferior to other's constitutes as hate speech along with your racial stereotypes of Asian and Pakistani people.
One point and 30 days suspension for probation violation.

I'd like to see the evidence that I claimed genetic superiority, I think I said evolutionary superiority, now that could well mean intellectual rather than genetic superiority.

Once again, any old excuse to hammer me with a suspension.

But the best of all, of course, Racial stereotyping of Asians and Pakistanis!

Are you saying that no asian men have been convicted by a court for grooming young british girls? is that what you're saying or can't you say it on this forum because you don't want to hear the truth?

Hate Crime, pull the other one, it's the truth!

[Darth Red]

Post: British nazism fractures once again
User: Sharpe's Company
Infraction: insulting others
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

insult (hate speech)

Message to User:

Claiming that races are genetically inferior to other's constitutes as hate speech along with your racial stereotypes of Asian and Pakistani people.

One point and 30 days suspension for probation violation.

Original Post:

First of all, the culture of the people living in the British Isles has changed time and again, however you cut it. Even if genetics seem to favour that a majority of Islanders are genetically linked to paleolithic settlers, language changed, customs changed, traditions changed and that because of infusions of new populations, either as ruling elites or as simple settlers.

Second, a policy of unrestricted immigration and of course genocide (by your definition) feature among the factors that led to the pre-eminence of "British Culture", and the rise of British empire in previous centuries. American Indians, Maori, Australian Aborigenees, African Natives, were all subjected to such policies.

White immigration was dictated by the same necessity that rules movement of population today: poverty, religious and other oppression, hope for safety. If you think you can remediate this by groups of thugs lynching people, you've got another thing coming.

If our culture didn't change we would be as weak as the Native Americans and like the African, would of been squatting on our land for thousands of years without anything to show for it. No, I am in complete agreement, the British have always looked forward rather than back and this is due to our evolutionary superiority over other races.

I'm glad you have admitted our genetics as a race haven't barely changed in 6,000 years, most people on this forum like the idea that the vikings brought along their wives with them as they were butchering monks and looting lindisfarne. There have been many genetic studies which show that anglo-saxons, scandinavians and others took native women as their wives, thus within a few short generations the racial profiles would of been similar to the native tribes, although linguistically and to a degree culturally very different but then today it is the English who honour King Arthur, did they in the 6th century I wonder?

Today is a modern phenomenon, we are being invaded by people's who do bring their women with them, and not only do they fail to adopt our culture, but they purposely reject our culture and continue their own. I suppose the grooming of young british girls by asian men has been one of the main differences between us, maybe in pakistan it is common for gangs of men to dominate and bully young girls but it isn't here in England.

So what I got from this is that your 'British genetics' are vastly superior to Native Americans and Africans (which is why you are apparently evolutionary superior) , Asian men have a penchant for brainwashing women and Pakistani's go right past the brainwashing and head strait for the dominating their women through gang bulling.

[Sharpe's Company]

'British genetics' are vastly superior to Native Americans and Africans

You are the person who has issued this infraction and yet you can't even get it right!

Did I actually say that?

I said they were weak, and when we look at the history this was indeed the case or are you in denial about history now? It makes me wonder how you could possibly explain the colonisation process of the Americas without suggesting that the native tribes were weak, if they were strong they would still control their own lands, free from the United States jurisdiction.

Evolutionary superiority could mean a great number of things, to suspend me for putting words into my mouth is slanderous.

Asian men have a penchant for brainwashing women and Pakistani's go right past the brainwashing and head strait for the dominating their women through gang bulling.

You don't read the newspapers do you?

Would you like me to quote the former british home secretary about this issue, or would you ban me again for posting it?

[Jom]

Could you give some examples of the great many things that "evolutionary superior" could mean?

[Sharpe's Company]

I am making a plea to the moderation team for Jom to be dropped from this case.

He has constantly given me a hard time on this forum and his judgment isn't neutral.

I will accept the judgment of somebody like Hotspur or Harry Lime who have shown neutrality in the past.

[Jom]

I am making a plea to the moderation team for Jom to be dropped from this case.

He has constantly given me a hard time on this forum and his judgment isn't neutral.

I will accept the judgment of somebody like Hotspur or Harry Lime who have shown neutrality in the past.

Unfortunately the judgement of Hotspur or Harry Lime is not available in the Tribunal, as they have moved on to pastures new, but I'm sure they're judging you silently every time you turn up here.

[Sharpe's Company]

Unfortunately the judgement of Hotspur or Harry Lime is not available in the Tribunal, as they have moved on to pastures new, but I'm sure they're judging you silently every time you turn up here.

I don't understand your comment, are you turning this into a personal issue so soon?

Your job, jom, is to provide the neutral conduct of this tribunal, I'm not convinced you are the man to oversee this judgement. You have already shown us that you're incapable to provide impartiality with the comment above.

[Jom]

I don't understand your comment, are you turning this into a personal issue so soon?

Your job, jom, is to provide the neutral conduct of this tribunal, I'm not convinced you are the man to oversee this judgement. You have already shown us that you're incapable to provide impartiality with the comment above.

I'd rather not make this a tit-for-tat thing, but I thought the question I asked was perfectly impartial. Indeed, so aware of my job am I that I made sure my first question was impartial.

People can be judged positively as well as negatively.

So, could you provide some examples of the many meanings of the term "evolutionary superior"?

[Sharpe's Company]

Well Jom it could mean intellectually, culturally and yes even genetically, although I don't believe personally that racial characteristics play such an important role, more so the ability to think, read and write, to be able to progress a theory based on trail and error. For example farming is a process of trail and error it's methods are built upon hundreds if not thousands of years of it, this process was still in it's infancy in North America when the English arrived, they didn't develope the adequate tools for instance and it was the English colonists who traded them such tools to complete their evolutionary process in agriculture. Without the arrival of the Englishman in North America who is not to say that today 400 years later they would still be in the same state of being they were in 1607?

I think it's well established that the process of evolution in Europe has accelerated quicker than the process in North America or Africa. Natural selection in the colonies provided evidence that the strong will undoubtedly control the weak by means of superiority in all it's forms, this is natrual selection.

As Thomas Huxley said, “No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average negro is the equal still less the superior, of the white man.”

[Jom]

Quoting someone who died over 100 years ago isn't really going to help your case, as science and biology are in quite different places compared to over a century ago. In 1912, people were saying that war would be impossible. In 1938, Chamberlain claimed he had secured peace in our time. Hindsight is a .

Your unscientific and out of date quotation makes a neat summary of your views on this matter, and I'm convinced of the racism of your post now.

[Jom]

And if you make one more post trying to reiterate your racist beliefs about the supposed inferiority of one race compared to another, you'll receive a contempt of court. This is not a soapbox for you to try and justify racism.

[Omnipotent-Q]

Sharpe,

Please can you explain your viewpoint as to why you think your post is not implying racial inferiority.

If our culture didn't change we would be as weak as the Native Americans and like the African, would of been squatting on our land for thousands of years without anything to show for it.

Today is a modern phenomenon, we are being invaded by people's who do bring their women with them, and not only do they fail to adopt our culture, but they purposely reject our culture and continue their own. I suppose the grooming of young british girls by asian men has been one of the main differences between us, maybe in pakistan it is common for gangs of men to dominate and bully young girls but it isn't here in England.

I'm not understanding your whole "evolutionary superiority" argument here as it fly's in total contradiction to scientific fact. It looks like you're trying to use the concepts and terms of human evolution in regards to H. Neanderthals and H. Sapiens (ability to speak and use language/cognition differences et al), and then somehow apply that to different races and cultures in the world. All despite humanity sharing the characteristic of being genetically homogenous.

With that last fact in mind, are you saying you're not implying that "Native Americans", "the African" and "asian men" are racially inferior with your post? Culture does not apply to evolution principles. Were you, or were you not, applying individual and derogatory bad personal traits, to whole racial groups here?

[Jom]

Appeal 842 - Insulting others (1 point) (unanimous)

The Tribunal finds that defining some races as evolutionary inferior or superior to others constitutes a violation of the insulting others clause, specifically the section on hate speech and using race as a means of insult.

Appeal DENIED.