I'm curious about something and I hope that we can generate some discussion regarding this particular topic given recent events.
With Honour&Glory our now most controversial member (I don't necessarily think so, but that is beside the point), I thought about the fact that if the Imperator allows us to vote for moderators, if it was also possible to draft some legislation that involved allowing for vote of no-confidence in junior moderators, indicating to the Staff that the curia was dissatisfied with a person that we had put into power.
I'm not suggesting that we draft this for Censor...erm Honour&Glory, and i would likely vote against such a motion of him, so please don't confuse my interest in the subject with the situation that made me consider it.
I realise that it is a highly controversial topic and it may be subject to a staff veto, but I'm wondering how far staff would let us go with such a piece of legislation? I also recoginize that it is potentially open to abuse, and thus perhaps would need guidelines to protect against such a bill.
But I also think that it is a natural extension of the ability to elect moderators.
Thoughts anyone? Or am I just thinking crazy thoughts?