View Poll Results: What game after Rome II?

Voters
129. You may not vote on this poll
  • TW Rome III (NO REALLY? Not even Rome II is released!)

    9 6.98%
  • Medieval 3

    65 50.39%
  • Empire 2

    54 41.86%
  • Shogun 3

    1 0.78%
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 84

Thread: Next after Rome II?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    TheRomanRuler's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,964

    Default Next after Rome II?

    What Total War game you wish they make next after Rome II?

    Note: NO NEW ERA, remember they could make "American civil war" expansion for Empire 2 etc.
    Last edited by TheRomanRuler; September 24, 2012 at 10:07 AM.
    Apologies for anyone who's message i may miss or not be able to answer

  2. #2
    TheRomanRuler's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,964

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Let me begin:
    Empire total war and its great expansion, Napoleon TW opened me completly new era, but in that era there happened SO MUCH, that it was impossible to get with mods. That is why i hope they make Total War: Empire 2, to show us rest of it:
    -No bugs
    -Real sized cities!
    -No bugs
    -Plenty of campaign map options
    -No bugs
    -Plenty of new techs
    -Realistic battles! Not "one long line, with deep of 1 men...
    Seriouselly, it has SO MUCH, if they make it more realistic, its COMPLETLY different to fight in America, India, Europe, Africa all of them reguire different gaming style;
    -In Africa you need to do medical tech upgrades due its tropical enviroment
    -In america you need to march your troops trough unkown lands, and ally with natives, or alternately, get ambushed by them
    -In europe, you must rely on brute strengh. No sneeking here will ever work!
    -In india, you face might of East

    That is for the start. If they make it as realistic as possible, its hard to even get your troops to march, due never before seen number of men in army(from beginning of campaign, smaller, and it grows bigger both histroically and trough gameplay), and due poor eguipment most of them had that time. Also beware of rising powers, such as Napoleon (HOPE its made realisticly) and Prussians
    Time period from 1618 (30 yers war)-1815, defeat of Napoleon

    Also most important thing: Hope its possible to choose from "Historical campaign", in which things happend realisticly, for example when Napoleon becomes general, all factions gain borders they had in that time, no matter of your previous campaigns.This is necessary becouse new factions are born. This is wonderful for me... But becouse many want make their own empire, they should also be able to choose "world conguest campaign"

    EDIT: But shortly, it tells story of gundpowder weapons.
    Last edited by TheRomanRuler; September 24, 2012 at 10:17 AM.
    Apologies for anyone who's message i may miss or not be able to answer

  3. #3

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Personally I'd like Medieval 3. But 3 sequels in a row? not likely

    But really, already a next TW game thread, while Rome 2 won't be out for over a year????????

  4. #4
    Alucard666's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    While I pray for Medieval 3, it has to be great as its predecessor (Graphics, Moddability), but not now, it is still the most moddable and favored game to some, so it should wait

    Victoria is too much, unless they make an engine concerning on the amount of factions (Change or revamp the turn system, EX: Making the faction turns go faster with ten times amount of factions)

    I think they should do another Empire, a revamp and a better one

  5. #5
    The Mouth's Avatar Ducenarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Barad-Dur
    Posts
    938

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    We need a new era IMO, as much as I would like to see Medieval 3 Total War.


    Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Ah, medieval 3, the activsion strategy.

    Are you people delusional? I even saw some call for Rome 3 RIGHT after Rome 2 is released or after the Next total war game.

    And to those that say that CA cannot achieve a victoria or ww1 game:

    So what? Because its too hard you don't try at all? Let's hide in our little holes and never come out?

  7. #7
    Stath's's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Makedonia, Greece
    Posts
    4,553

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    New Era (5th-10th century)


  8. #8
    TheRomanRuler's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,964

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by hannibalbarca13 View Post
    New Era (5th-10th century)
    Not new, Barbarian Invasion expansion for Rome TW covers it (assuming they make another one, which they should)
    Apologies for anyone who's message i may miss or not be able to answer

  9. #9
    Stath's's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Makedonia, Greece
    Posts
    4,553

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheRomanRuler View Post
    Not new, Barbarian Invasion expansion for Rome TW covers it (assuming they make another one, which they should)
    It doesn't I mean about the period after Rome's fall. With Justinian, Heraclius, Chosroes,maybe Charlemagne, Arab Caliphate.

    But about the choices you give, I 'd like a MedIII but earlier starting with the Bulgarians against Byzantines and of course including the crusades. Different campaigns with many years in between them (800, 1000, 1204)

    But not Victorian era, nothing too close to our years. No cannons at this extent and people with uniforms.


    And a hidden choice: China:Warring States


  10. #10

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    None of the above.

    I'm a Victoria man, through and through. I want to see a campaign lasting from 1835 to 1920.
    Last edited by Colonel Dax; September 25, 2012 at 07:57 AM.

  11. #11
    The Useless Member's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chlοe's Basement, 'Merca
    Posts
    3,168

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel Dax View Post
    None of the above.

    I'm a Victoria man, through and through. I want to see a campaign lasting from 1835 to 1920.
    Victoria 2 would be my second choice.

    I'm shootin' for ETW2.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wetblowdryer View Post
    Victoria 2 would be my second choice.

    I'm shootin' for ETW2.
    Victoria 2 would be like an empire 2 in many ways.

  13. #13
    The Useless Member's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chlοe's Basement, 'Merca
    Posts
    3,168

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by vinh834 View Post
    Victoria 2 would be like an empire 2 in many ways.
    If CA did make another Empire, I'd personally like it to start somewhere around 1500.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel Dax View Post
    None of the above.

    I'm a Victoria man, through and through. I want to see a campaign lasting from 1835 to 1920.
    THis

  15. #15

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Woops, double post.

  16. #16
    emptw1's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Hertford, Hertfordshire, England
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    I'd prefer an Empire 2, starting in the 1700's maybe 1600's, right up until 1914/18, showing the whole foundations of an empire, imperial ambitions, and everyone wanting a piece, along with empires reaching their heights, and huge empires clashing, with all sorts of varied troops from all sorts of colonies, from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to Australia, maybe, being able to fund expeditions to places like Australia, or other unexplored places like the American West, allowing the player to form their own overseas colonies etc.

  17. #17
    Ciciro's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Capital
    Posts
    4,038

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Where is Victoria?

  18. #18

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuddles the cat View Post
    Where is Victoria?
    Don't even bother to read the first post?

    No new eras

  19. #19
    shikaka's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Miskolc/Budapest (HUN)
    Posts
    2,222

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    I hope none from the poll.

  20. #20
    TheRomanRuler's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,964

    Default Re: Next after Rome II?

    So most people seriouselly think TW:s already cover all eras, or do they just dislike them?
    Honestly, after 100 yers its already hard to recoronise your home town, even pre-classical era. So eras are NOT covered yet.
    Last edited by TheRomanRuler; December 06, 2012 at 05:29 AM.
    Apologies for anyone who's message i may miss or not be able to answer

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •