View Poll Results: Which Map would you choose? Refer to Post #564

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • Map A)

    15 53.57%
  • Map b)

    13 46.43%
Page 27 of 56 FirstFirst ... 217181920212223242526272829303132333435363752 ... LastLast
Results 521 to 540 of 1116

Thread: End of Antiquity Campaign: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

  1. #521

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    A note to the last two pictures from the post 516 - I believe they are Yenisei Kyrgyzes, not Gokturks. Kyrgyzes amoury was distinct one, you should not mix those things.


  2. #522
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Quote Originally Posted by Silesian_Noble View Post
    A note to the last two pictures from the post 516 - I believe they are Yenisei Kyrgyzes, not Gokturks. Kyrgyzes amoury was distinct one, you should not mix those things.
    kırgız were vassal of göktürks.

  3. #523

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Quote Originally Posted by Silesian_Noble View Post
    A note to the last two pictures from the post 516 - I believe they are Yenisei Kyrgyzes, not Gokturks. Kyrgyzes amoury was distinct one, you should not mix those things.
    About the first picture here his original description in russian:

    Начало битвы тюрок и китайцев
    На реконструкции изображено начало сражения тяжеловооруженной тюркской конницы с копьеносной китайской пехотой (VII век)

    Translate:
    The beginning of the Battle of the Turks and the Chinese
    At the beginning of the battle of reconstruction shows a heavily Turkish cavalry with infantry kopenosnoy Chinese (VII century)

    And the second picture yeah I think that is of Khirgyg cavalry, altough they weren´t very influenciate by the Gokturk? So their armors could not be very similar?



  4. #524
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    kırgız were vassal to göktürks in 6.century.after chinese hegemony over göktürks they were independent.

    i plan to make kırgız warriors inside göktürk army.

  5. #525

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Quote Originally Posted by karaislam View Post
    kırgız were vassal to göktürks in 6.century.after chinese hegemony over göktürks they were independent.

    i plan to make kırgız warriors inside göktürk army.
    1. Even if they were vassals I don't believe they were fighting within Gokturk army. They could pay some tribute in nature goods or crafts. Also I don't know how that vassalage could look like but I know how the vassalage of the Kyrgyzes looked when Uighurs were their overlord - Kyrgyzes fought them all the time till they finally crushed Uighur Kaghanate in 840y

    2. Look at your map and now look where Yeniesei Kyrgyzes lived... This is so frickin far from your map range... So even if Kyrgyzes were forced to fight in Gokturk army they would rather assist them in local conflicts - it is very unlikely that Gokturks would take them to the far west edge of their empire.

    Of course you will do what you like but my opinion is that in your case Kyrgyzes within Gokturk army is unbelievable thing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rampante-Cid View Post
    And the second picture yeah I think that is of Khirgyg cavalry, altough they weren´t very influenciate by the Gokturk? So their armors could not be very similar?
    Kyrgyzes were great armourers itself and they had own style. There certainly had to be some similarities but I don't expect Gokturks influensed Kyrgyzes (though I may be wrong here). I mean Kyrgyzes were masters itselfs so they didn't need to copy other patterns.


  6. #526
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    not onyl turkish but kırgız sources also accept this

    http://www.kirgizistan.somee.com/kokturkdonemi.asp

    about kırgız recruitment in göktürk army i am not sure yet.i did not read anywhere.but in those times göktürks had collected nearly all the turkish kavims into 1.in the wars i suppose they were wanting them send some soldiers.it looks logical to me.later empire always did that way.but i ll investigate more.

  7. #527
    Caudillo87's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Fontana, Ca (Alta California)
    Posts
    451

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Yes very nice, if you guys have any more info on avars, khazars and steppe peoples in general that fit our timeframe please do share as well.

  8. #528

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    http://geacron.com/home-en/?&sid=GeaCron60191

    In this website you can see every geopolitical changes in the whole world each year from 3000 BC till today.
    I've chosen the year 600 for you in this link, so it shows a map of how the world was in year 600. This should help you with startpos at least.

  9. #529

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Even if Krygyz fought for Gokturks, they would do that for Eastern Gokturks, not the Westerners which is our case.

    There will be already enough tribes to make if we consider that Khazaria and Old Bulgaria were bound to Western Khaganate as well.
    Last edited by Tureuki; February 19, 2013 at 02:09 AM.

  10. #530

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tureuki View Post
    Even if Krygyz fought for Gokturks, they would do that for Eastern Gokturks, not the Westerners which is our case.
    Great point mate.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tureuki View Post
    There will be already enough tribes to make if we consider that Khazaria and Old Bulgaria were bound to Western Khaganate as well.
    Exactly. I will give you a hint borrowed from wiki: the Uch-Karluks remained in the Western Turkic Kaganate under a non-autonomous home rule, as the members of the five Tele (see: Tiele) tribes that did not receive autonomy: the Karluk, Yagma, Kipchak, Basmyl and Chuban. Those tribes were located not that far from your north-east map corner.


  11. #531

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Ok so thats what we will use for east of Caspian, but did Khagans had their own tribe ?(normally they should) what was the name ? what about the Hephtalites ? I guess they survived in the timeframe as vassals ?

  12. #532
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Göktürk zili and Göktürk madalyonu.





  13. #533
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)


  14. #534
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tureuki View Post
    Even if Krygyz fought for Gokturks, they would do that for Eastern Gokturks, not the Westerners which is our case.

    There will be already enough tribes to make if we consider that Khazaria and Old Bulgaria were bound to Western Khaganate as well.
    another opposite logic can come

    turks were seperating the country into 2 pieces.west and east.

    power center would be the east.kagan would lead the east.the reason is china is neighbour.they are crowd and strong.

    in the west would be kagans brother or trusted relative.

    it does not mean that they are too much seperated eachother.if west göktürks goes to war east would send help ofcourse.

  15. #535
    Vladyvid's Avatar Wizard of Turmish
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Athkatla
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    it does not mean that they are too much seperated eachother.if west göktürks goes to war east would send help ofcourse.
    Right then, some important points to consider for you:

    1. Your map doesnt cover much of göktürk empire, only but a fraction of it, making their presence only partial.
    2. If you insist that west göktürks would receive help from the east ones, then you should also take into account the reverse situation that east should get help from west. Since you dont have a map streaching that far east, and you cant implement a feature that would require west göktürks to aid the east ones, then only logical and fair would be to deprive the west göktürks of east help.

    Also the question of being separated or not is irrelevant because in reality they were separated by distance of lands and each had to guard their own borders separately, regardless if they were siblings, father and son etc. Just like the Roman Empire was one empire but had their legions scattered across huge areas and not acting as one army sitting in one place always ready to defeat any enemy.

    Giving them extra military support doesnt seem to be a reasonable solution because you are only looking at the benefits and large empire was not only benefits but also threats and danger from every side, including internal affairs. If its a problem to accept that west göktürks get no help from the east - it can be simply explained that the east göktürks are busy fighting someone else, like China, and so they cant send help. You wont help them fight China, so you should not expect to get help from them aswell.

  16. #536
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    our mapper archagates ll try to move the map to east around 500-1000km.

  17. #537

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Quote Originally Posted by karaislam View Post
    another opposite logic can come

    turks were seperating the country into 2 pieces.west and east.

    power center would be the east.kagan would lead the east.the reason is china is neighbour.they are crowd and strong.

    in the west would be kagans brother or trusted relative.

    it does not mean that they are too much seperated eachother.if west göktürks goes to war east would send help ofcourse.
    They did not separate without a reason and the reason was never friendly relationship but competition for power, selfish ambitions, etc. Do you know examples when eastern Kaghanate help the Western one?


  18. #538

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    There some pictures of the Gokturk Standart:








    Last edited by Rampante-Cid; February 19, 2013 at 03:33 PM.



  19. #539
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    yes in school we ve learned so i suppose.

    about kırgız u were right.they are with eastern khaganete.

    with western kgahanete these tribes are available.karluk,kimak,basmil,türgeş,tolash,çiğil,kangar,macars,hazars

    with eastern kgahanete these tribes are available.kırgız,tardush,telanguts,bayırku,tatars,oğuzlar,uygurs.

    so kırgız wont be in my roster.

    i need to model now.
    Last edited by karaislam; February 23, 2013 at 02:32 AM.

  20. #540

    Default Re: End of Antiquity: The First Crusade (612 - 710)

    Could be possible that some of the high level units and nobles of the Gokturks used close helmets or bayda (egg helm) like their sassanid opponets? Maybe the western gokturk could achieved these helmets like war tropheums or with comerce with sassanids.

    Bayda helmets:






Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •