Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: M2TW faster than RTW?

  1. #1
    aqd's Avatar .........
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Taipei
    Posts
    5,824

    Default M2TW faster than RTW?

    Hello guys!


    I just noticed that with ATI 4670 gfx chip, RTW seems to be a lot slower than M2TW on mid-high graphics settings (1920x1080, AA 2x, 'high' for everything, huge scale). And this is only my RTW mod vs Third Age Total War. The performance of RTW is even slower with RTR VII which has improved environment and trees over vanilla. The FPS is down to 16 when I look at my soldiers in replay mode closely, and 7 when phalanx armies are engaging (I put camera in the middle of soldiers)


    Am I the only one who encounters the problem? It's quite frustrating because I intend to bring even more detailed textures into my RTW mod, maybe 1024x1024....

  2. #2
    Wetblowdryer's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    2,185

    Default Re: M2TW faster than RTW?

    lolno

    I can run Rome way better than M2, and I can run S2 on Max settings.
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...8#post12354888
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...1#post12253471
    Quote Originally Posted by Wetblowdryer View Post
    Wetblowdryer gets tiresome with Wetblowdryer's ignorance.

  3. #3
    aqd's Avatar .........
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Taipei
    Posts
    5,824

    Default Re: M2TW faster than RTW?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wetblowdryer View Post
    lolno

    I can run Rome way better than M2, and I can run S2 on Max settings.
    Umm, including the mods with 512x512 texture too? with max settings?

  4. #4
    Wetblowdryer's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    2,185

    Default Re: M2TW faster than RTW?

    No mods.

    I just leave the whatever it's called msax15 or something like that off.
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...8#post12354888
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...1#post12253471
    Quote Originally Posted by Wetblowdryer View Post
    Wetblowdryer gets tiresome with Wetblowdryer's ignorance.

  5. #5
    LestaT's Avatar Imperator
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    KVALA LVMPVR
    Posts
    9,495

    Default Re: M2TW faster than RTW?

    Quote Originally Posted by aqd View Post
    Hello guys!

    I just noticed that with ATI 4670 gfx chip, RTW seems to be a lot slower than M2TW on mid-high graphics settings (1920x1080, AA 2x, 'high' for everything, huge scale). And this is only my RTW mod vs Third Age Total War. The performance of RTW is even slower with RTR VII which has improved environment and trees over vanilla. The FPS is down to 16 when I look at my soldiers in replay mode closely, and 7 when phalanx armies are engaging (I put camera in the middle of soldiers)

    Am I the only one who encounters the problem? It's quite frustrating because I intend to bring even more detailed textures into my RTW mod, maybe 1024x1024....
    Yes because Med2 uses upgraded Rome engine. Much like S2 is faster than NTW which is faster than ETW because same engine but upgraded and optimized.

    On my old Pentium 4 Med2 runs better than RTW on the same settings.
    CIVITATVS CVM AVGVSTVS XVI, MMVI

  6. #6
    Colonel Dax's Avatar Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    The Second Circle of Hell
    Posts
    738

    Default Re: M2TW faster than RTW?

    Using a Radeon HD 5770, Roma Surrectum II runs just as smoothly as Stainless Steel, if not more so (especially when additional programs are running in the background).
    I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •