The Morality of Homosexuality and Homosexual conduct [Frozenprince v. sterling] - commentary

[frozenprince]

It's not that hard to win when your opponents argument is A) stolen, and B) based on a premise thats stupid as all hell.

[Phier]

How utterly simplistic.

Kropotkin theorised with evidence that co-operation within groups is natural. Killing is in accordance with our nature but so is co-operation. Morality is a construct perhaps but it defines socially acceptable things within groups and the groups have grown exponentially along with the needs of groups. As a construct or even as an objective measure of an observable instinctual event nothing ever points towards murder being moral except in artificial circumstances.

Ummmm I wasn't using that as proof of morality, I was using that to demonstrate the poor logic being used in the debate.

[Denny Crane!]

Ummmm I wasn't using that as proof of morality, I was using that to demonstrate the poor logic being used in the debate.

Yeah I got that afterwards

[Facupay]

1. If we act, we ought to act in accordance with our nature.
2. Homosexual acts are contrary to our nature.
3. Therefore, homosexual acts are immoral

Even if the premises weren't false, it isn't a correct syllogism. It should be:

1. Acts contrary to our nature are immoral
2. Homosexual acts are contrary to our nature
---------------------------------
3. Homosexual acts are immoral

[Facupay]

delete