<a href="http://www.game-advertising-online.com/" target="_blank">Game Advertising Online</a><br /> banner requires iframes
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

  1. #1
    Hambi's Avatar Yari-hei
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    139

    Default 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    Hail my fellow Romans! (or at least fans of the Ancient time)

    After years I fell like starting a new Rome TW-campaign and have been watching this mod a long time. The question is; should I start with the stable 2.0, the Beta 2.5 or even wait for x weeks/months for a new version (2.6 I think)?

    I really want to be able to go through the whole game, so I prefer waiting for a stable release over starting into the unknown...

    greez
    Hambi

  2. #2
    Paedric's Avatar RS local moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,221

    Default Re: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    The 2.5beta has a few bugs, but it should be as stable as 2.1a (which is the latest stable). But 2.1a (and by extent 2.0) has some bugs too, probably even more.

    As for 2.6, I don't really know when it will be released.
    Under the patronage of apple.
    Patron of ybbon66.

  3. #3
    mishkin's Avatar Jukutatsu shita
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vigo, GZ.
    Posts
    4,099

    Default Re: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    I suggest 2.1a
    "Debate in good faith and respect other members".

    One of the most promising modifications for Medieval II

  4. #4
    carmir's Avatar Taihō no heishi
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    493

    Default Re: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    Quote Originally Posted by Paedric View Post
    The 2.5beta has a few bugs, but it should be as stable as 2.1a (which is the latest stable). But 2.1a (and by extent 2.0) has some bugs too, probably even more.

    As for 2.6, I don't really know when it will be released.
    Quote Originally Posted by mishkin View Post
    I suggest 2.1a
    I suggest 2.5. For me, the only really annoying thing was that the roman military careers don't work, but otherwise the traits system is much improved.

    edit: and 1000 other things are also improved.
    Last edited by carmir; June 29, 2012 at 09:38 AM.

  5. #5
    tone's Avatar Just visiting
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    22,876

    Default Re: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    2.5


    Under patronage of Spirit of Rob; Patron of Century X, Pacco, Cherryfunk, Leif Erikson. Become a Roma Surrectum 2 Beta tester!

  6. #6
    Hambi's Avatar Yari-hei
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    139

    Default Re: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    alrighty, thanks guys! I'll check the 2.5 forum a bit better and probably start with 2.5 then!

  7. #7
    century x's Avatar Grand Master Yoda
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    4,505

    Default Re: 2.0, 2.5 or 2.6

    OF course 2.5

    Proudly under the patronage of Tone

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •