YesSo you are saying that adding a rule that removes something completly unfair, something that applies to anyone behind you in turn order is unfair if it's added while a turn?
Rules are not added in the middle of a turn.If yes then you still weren't allowed to do it because it was obviously added when Norseman agreed to move his army back in range of mine.
THe rule wasn't active when that army was defeated.This was like I said 9 days ago so the rule was definitly active when you did your turn.
If anyone can complain about the rule being applied then it may be Norseman, but he made an agreement with me that you broke when you subbed him.
Bad movements. Rules aren't added in the middle of a turn.Also you definition of unfair seems strange:
Adding a rule for equality of oppertunity is unfair, but abusing movements which were done because of a rule that was added in the last turn by breaking this rule is fair? Breaking an agreement of other players while subbing is fair?!
I caught Norseman by suprise and you just made a bad movement. Now you should have deal with the consequences as every other player else has to.
Also it's not sure that I will get your army. Maybe my spy is unable to open the gate and you get an oppertunity for retreat.
All this isn't relevant. I'm pretty sure that you didn't defeat the biggest part of my army anyway but whatever, not relevant.
You know, if you wanna win like this, as you always do, go ahead. Make me replay. Just don't expect anybody to be happy for you. Or praise for your "genius strategy".