I don't support forced appropriation of anyone's property under any circumstances, whereas you do when it's done against people you personally dislike, and simultaneously oppose it when others do it to others.And if it was really socialist, you would probably support it. Wouldn't you?
Well, no, because I never said that he royal family was a 'necessity'. Just that there's no logical reason to get rid of them. You were the one who claimed that they were parasites, and I pointed out that the British royal family is a net contributor to the British state, and a president would only cost more.Leaving the property issue aside, and given the lack of answer on the rest, I guess you agree with me, none of the argument presented in the video make the royal family a necessity.