Origins of the Ghurids

[wudang_clown]

KUR is a Polish word for rooster, actually.

It has several other meanings: a cocky man; a belligerent man.

Now, Ghor (with long "o") is a derivate of Polish "góry" ("ó" is a remnant of old Polish long "o"), which means "mountains". Nothing less, nothing more.

This is actually best possible explanation of the term Ghor, because Poles and Pashtuns not only share haplogroup R1a1a, and that means we share ancestry which dates long before any Turk even dared to think about jumping on any horse and travel on its back, but also certain other features, like belligerence (just please come to Poland, and walking down the street you will meet a dozen of different braves, small and big, wanting to duel with you bare nuckles for whatever reason) and both nations love to be independent.

Obviously, there is also structural similarity between Polish language and Pashto. Obviously, both are Indo-European, which is attested best in clearly Polish origin of the word "Ghur"/góry/mountains. Ergo, Ghur is Urheimat of Polish people. There is a saying in Polish: "Pole and Hungarian cousins be":

Pole and Hungarian cousins be,
good for fight and good for party.
Both are valiant, both are lively,
Upon them may God's blessings be.

This text dates to late XVIII c., but clearly this has to be bollocks made up by Panturkists. If its author had any brains, it should go:

Pole and Pashtun brothers be,
good for fight and good for party.
Both are valiant, both are lively,
Upon them may God's blessings be.

Seriously, given the proof I've just presented, how could anyone claim that Ghur region is not Polish and that our Pogórze is not Pashto??? In fact, Poles and Pashtuns should claim back what's theirs (that is most of Central Asia).

Wait a minute... Am I spamming the forum?