Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

  1. #1

    Default "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Chaps,
    What is the difference between Ranger qualified individuals in the U.S Army and the 75th Rangers? I understand that Rangers are "elite Commando" by British Army estimate. I also understand that members of U.S Airborne divisions at certain qualification, meet Ranger credential. The 75th is entirely comprised of Ranger qualified members. Yet anybody that gets face time on the camera in the U.S military is both Airborne and Ranger qualified it seems.... I look at their chevrons. Not so elite?
    "My God, I wish we had the 9th Australian Division with us this morning."
    - - Major-General Francis de Guingaund, Chief of Staff, Allied Land-Forces Headquarters Europe, D-Day, 1944

    "Australian troops had, at Milne Bay, inflicted on the Japanese their first undoubted defeat on land. Some of us may forget that, of all the allies, it was the Australians who first broke the invincibility of the Japanese army."
    — Field Marshal Sir William Slim.

  2. #2
    Xanthippus of Sparta's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    near Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    1,758

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    My understanding of it, from a friend of mine who served in the 75th, was that many officers go into Ranger school to get the special training...it may actually be a requirement for some, I'm not sure about this though. They wear the Ranger tab without actually serving in the "Ranger Battalion" as my friend used to refer to it as.



    "The fact is that every war suffers a kind of progressive degradation with every month that it continues, because such things as individual liberty and a truthful press are not compatible with military efficency."
    -George Orwell, in Homage to Catalonia, 1938.

  3. #3

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Just that: Ranger qualified means they passed the training course, Rangers are the members of specific Ranger formations.
    Quote Originally Posted by Denny Crane! View Post
    How about we define the rights that allow a government to say that isn't within my freedom.

  4. #4
    alexanderswift's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    1,321

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Aye, as stated above I think it'd be similar to earning your wings (jump training) at least in the Canadian Army, anyone can do the training and qualify without necessarily serving as airborne (Or Rangers in this case.).
    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    Don't try and kill my internet joy.

    It is all I have.

  5. #5
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Someone who went to Ranger School is Ranger qualified (or Ranger tabbed).

    Someone who served in the 75th Ranger Regiment is a Ranger.

    Ranger School is a 62 day leadership course that is available to soldiers who qualify regardless if they serve in the 75th Ranger Regiment. However, all NCOs and Officers in the 75th Ranger Regiment must complete Ranger School. People with Ranger tabs serve in nearly all units in the US Army, and some serve in other branches and allied nations. Most Army Infantry officers are Ranger tabbed by the way.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  6. #6
    saglam2000's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York State
    Posts
    1,515

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    As he said, the 75th are the actual rangers. Ranger qualified is a tab you get saying you've spent 60 days of your life in a hell hole for a tab.
    "The Turks are never trapped. It's the people who surround them who are in trouble."Anthony Hebert

    ‎"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." Christopher Hitchens

  7. #7

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Thank you gentlemen.
    "My God, I wish we had the 9th Australian Division with us this morning."
    - - Major-General Francis de Guingaund, Chief of Staff, Allied Land-Forces Headquarters Europe, D-Day, 1944

    "Australian troops had, at Milne Bay, inflicted on the Japanese their first undoubted defeat on land. Some of us may forget that, of all the allies, it was the Australians who first broke the invincibility of the Japanese army."
    — Field Marshal Sir William Slim.

  8. #8

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Someone who went to Ranger School is Ranger qualified (or Ranger tabbed).

    Someone who served in the 75th Ranger Regiment is a Ranger.

    Ranger School is a 62 day leadership course that is available to soldiers who qualify regardless if they serve in the 75th Ranger Regiment. However, all NCOs and Officers in the 75th Ranger Regiment must complete Ranger School. People with Ranger tabs serve in nearly all units in the US Army, and some serve in other branches and allied nations. Most Army Infantry officers are Ranger tabbed by the way.
    You got it sir. Now stop messing it up in the Military Advice thread...

  9. #9

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Quote Originally Posted by OG Grenadier View Post
    Chaps,
    What is the difference between Ranger qualified individuals in the U.S Army and the 75th Rangers? I understand that Rangers are "elite Commando" by British Army estimate. I also understand that members of U.S Airborne divisions at certain qualification, meet Ranger credential. The 75th is entirely comprised of Ranger qualified members. Yet anybody that gets face time on the camera in the U.S military is both Airborne and Ranger qualified it seems.... I look at their chevrons. Not so elite?
    Not quite. "Ranger school" is a course to teach small unit tactics and is the functional equivalent of the Infantry Battle School in Brecon, Wales. Passing it is a major thumbs up for future promotion, especially in the infantry.

    Conversely most graduates of Ranger school do not serve in the 75th Infantry Regiment (Ranger), and most of the personnel of said regiment are not Ranger qualified. The bulk of the 75th (prettymuch everyone below SSgt) is qualified for the unit by completing the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program, an 8 week course replacing the old Ranger Indoctrination Program which was 4 weeks. RASP is roughly equivalent to the British class 1 infantryman qualification.

    To be promoted to SSgt in the 75th requires successfully completing Ranger school proper.

    Essentially:

    ~

    and

    ~

  10. #10
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Again 67th Tigers is wrong...

    To be promoted to SGT not SSG you must be Ranger Qualified. The British equivalent of the 75th Rangers is the Special Forces Support Group (founded to give the British a Ranger Regiment equivalent).
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  11. #11
    Protector Domesticus
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,045

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    67th Tigers is still around?

    .....

    my life.

  12. #12

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Again 67th Tigers is wrong...

    To be promoted to SGT not SSG you must be Ranger Qualified. The British equivalent of the 75th Rangers is the Special Forces Support Group (founded to give the British a Ranger Regiment equivalent).
    No, the SFSG was formed based on experience that such a thing is useful. It is essentially 1 Para and F coy, RM. There was nothing that 75th Infantry could do that the Parachute Regiment couldn't, but it was decided higher up to permanently move a Para Bn over to UKSF so as to "preserve the lineage" of 1 Para, which was going to be cut.

    If you know the history of the Infantry Battle School, Brecon (once the Parachute Battle School) you'll know that modern Ranger school was modelled on it. They had found in Vietnam that their training for junior commanders was extremely inadequate and adapted the then PBS as a model.

    The idea this is a "British Ranger Regiment" is idle press speculation.

  13. #13
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: "Ranger Qualified" compared to 75th Rangers

    Umm...

    Ranger School predates the Vietnam War, it was founded in 1950..

    What is super funny is that the Infantry School, Brecon wasn't around except to process draftees when Ranger School was founded. I just with 67th Tigers would be as knowledgeable as he pretends to be.

    Wrong again 67th
    Last edited by Farnan; April 03, 2012 at 09:18 PM.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •