View Poll Results: What faction do you most want added in the 1100 early era campaign?

Voters
168. You may not vote on this poll
  • Georgia

    37 22.02%
  • Sultanate of Rum

    14 8.33%
  • Serbia

    23 13.69%
  • Shirvanshahs

    3 1.79%
  • Abassids

    29 17.26%
  • Volga Bulgars

    5 2.98%
  • Suzdal

    4 2.38%
  • Pisa

    3 1.79%
  • Croatia

    2 1.19%
  • Zirids

    1 0.60%
  • Danishmends

    2 1.19%
  • Sweden

    19 11.31%
  • Mosul

    0 0%
  • Ireland

    21 12.50%
  • Orkneys

    5 2.98%
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 101 to 111 of 111

Thread: Realistic Early Era Poll

  1. #101

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Add Sweden please

  2. #102
    Ferdiad's Avatar Patricius
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    28,043

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    In the 1100 era campaign? Not likely.

  3. #103

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Bulgaria or Burgundy.

  4. #104

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Quote Originally Posted by -Myth- View Post
    Bulgaria or Burgundy.
    Both of those are on the late era poll but don't make as much sense in 1100.

  5. #105
    RollingWave's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,083

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    We could use a simple scoring system and figure things out quite well.... divide into 4 catagory

    1. independent : 25 points for fully independent 10 for semi, 0 for not at all
    2. unique : 25 for unique, 10 for considerable crossover, 0 for high crossover
    3. influential : 25 for very influential, 10 for regionally influential 0 for not influential.
    4. sustained : 25 if the state or at least the concept of that state is long lasting, 10 if it's only moderately lasting, and 0 for not lasting.

    By that logic..

    Georgia : 85 (only regionally influential but otherwise full score)

    Rum : 60-70 ( regionally influentil and not very unqiue)

    Seriba : 85 (see Georgia)

    Shirvanshahs : 35 (was semi independent and concept of Azerbijian lasted, but otherwise meh)

    Abbasids : 75-85 (only partially independent at best but otherwise full score, the concept of the Caliphate lasted on even after the destruction of Baghdad.

    Volga Bulgaria : 55-70 ( this one is difficult to judge, it was definately independent, but only regionally significant at best, we don't know what it's roster is like but presumablly at least some crossover with Cumans, the concept of the state is only somewhat held on )

    Suzdal : 45 (not unique at all and the concept of it's sustainability is debatable.)

    Pisa : 45 (not unique and not particularly sustained )

    Croatia : 50-60 (not independent, and thus not influential either)

    Zirids : 25 (it's debatable if they're even indepedently existing at 1100, espeically outside of it's two major cities. though the general region it did control remained a concept of a state (Tunisia)

    Danishmends : 10-25 (well it's independent.. sorta.. but that's about it.)

    Sweden : 60 (it's independent and obviously the concept of that state lasted, but it was neithe that unique nor did it really extend it's influence much for most of the period.)

    Cilicia Armenia : 70-85 (again, mostly just lacking in influence and depend on how you argue the concept of the Armenian state.)

    Mosul : 0-25 (at 1100, it wasn't independent, if it was we could argue that all but a couple of the Turks starting settlement were independent too, wasn't that unique, didn't last, and it's impact by itself was minimal, though the Zengid dynasy did base out of that region for awhile, it was their conquest of Syria and the ability to try and pull together most other Turkish rulers of the region that gave them the influence. even if your kinda and give their maximum influence potential based on everything Zengi + Nur al Din + Saladin did it still isn't enough.)

    Ireland : 60 (it's unique and the concept lasted, but otherwise it had no influence at all and wasn't even really independent at that point. the Norman exercised at least some degree of control over them.

    Orkney : 0 (really? it was just an outpost of Norway, and for most of the medieval era owed alligence to the Scots as well.)
    1180, an unprecedented period of peace and prosperity in East Asia, it's technology and wealth is the envy of the world. But soon conflict will engulf the entire region with great consequences and lasting effects for centuries to come, not just for this region, but the entire known world, when one man, one people, unites.....

  6. #106

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Quote Originally Posted by RollingWave View Post
    We could use a simple scoring system and figure things out quite well.... divide into 4 catagory

    1. independent : 25 points for fully independent 10 for semi, 0 for not at all
    2. unique : 25 for unique, 10 for considerable crossover, 0 for high crossover
    3. influential : 25 for very influential, 10 for regionally influential 0 for not influential.
    4. sustained : 25 if the state or at least the concept of that state is long lasting, 10 if it's only moderately lasting, and 0 for not lasting.
    I would change unique to another category- power vacuum on map.

    Rum is a Turk faction similar to Seljuks but how unique is the difference between Norway and Denmark or the Iberian factions? That doesn't seem a strong argument to me. Half the eastern factions in this era are going to have heavy Turk influence, should we just not include them because of that?

    Independent is good, sustained is important, influential is even better, while power vacuum on the map is the most important for game balance and fun since we can acknowledge we aren't going to get it perfect given its a game with many constraints.

    That said the scores would then be like this-

    Georgia 80
    Rum 70
    Serbia 70
    Shirvanshahs 70
    Abbasids 70-100 depending on how you define 'influential and sustained'
    Volga Bulgaria 70
    Suzdal 60
    Pisa 55
    Croatia 55
    Zirids 60
    Danishmends 40
    Sweden 45 'so low because Sweden did not exist yet- 10 semi-independent, 0 for map power vacuum, 10 regionally influential, 25 sustained'
    Cilician Armenia 55
    Mosul 70 'if considered as Zengids which may have been a better name for the poll but was referring to sustained regional power, Zengids start as Seljuk vassal but are already semi-independent during this period become fully independent and take over Egypt and kick out Crusaders 25 hugely influential and 10 sustained, 25 map power vaccum'
    Ireland 55
    Orkney 40


    Additionally looking into it more I think we could probably create a roster for Volgar Bulgars. A mix of Turkic tribes and Uralic/Chudes with maybe even some Magyars and Bashkirs. It would be interesting to have an Islamic faction in the north like that.
    Last edited by Ichon; March 29, 2012 at 02:46 PM.

  7. #107

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Voted for Georgia, caucasus needs more factions. Serbia for balkans if possible. Muslims factions are also great, abassids or Rum, never heard them but... Whatever.

  8. #108
    Ferdiad's Avatar Patricius
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    28,043

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    The Sultanate of Rum turned into the Ottoman Empire.

  9. #109
    King Yngvar's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,205

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Sweden was added to the Baltic submod. Just use that.
    Change to two turns per year and optimize growth for that.
    Mongols and Timurids would all then be so far away in turn numbers that there would be no more point in having them in the early campaign. Also, remove Khwarezm.
    There is now five slots:
    Sweden, Ireland, Flanders, Burgundy, Bulgaria


    For late campaign, it's even easier. Make it start in 1240.
    Remove Khwarezm, Cumans and Kiev (under Mongols).
    Remove Jerusalem.
    Six slots:
    Sweden, Bulgaria, Serbia, Latin Empire, Bohemia, Navarre
    It's redundant to write your username at the end of your post,
    if I wanted to see your name I'd look to the left of my screen.

  10. #110

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    IF we do that than the eastern part of the map will be pretty much deserted while the west will be overcrowded.

  11. #111

    Default Re: Realistic Early Era Poll

    Wales

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •