Civitate Review - May

**Spiff** · June 04, 2006, 09:49 AM

The Consilium de Civitate has been up and running for about half a month now. During that time the members of the Council and participating senior staff have continued the process of reviewing and voting on potential Civitates.

Following Justinians April Review, the following results were recorded in May 2006

21 Candidates were Discussed and Voted on

14 were accepted
7 were rejected

66.7% of candidates passed.
33.3% of candidates failed.

The Council took part in five of these votes. Of this five, 2 failed to pass while 3 succeeded.

EDIT:
Thanks to the Grim Squeaker

**Perikles** · June 04, 2006, 09:54 AM

Almost the same as last month. Although less candidates were proposed, meaning the CDC is stemming the tide, or Pleb quality is falling.... :wink:

**Halie Satanus** · June 04, 2006, 09:55 AM

Just out of interest how many did the CdeC fail ?.

**Spiff** · June 04, 2006, 09:59 AM

In May the Consilium de Civitate, once active, played an active part in the discussion of five potential Civitates.

Of this five, 2 failed to pass while 3 succeeded.

EDIT

ill add that to the first post

**Tom Paine** · June 04, 2006, 10:33 AM

Actually, Spiff, to correct you, the appropriate figure is 21 civitates were proposed, 14 passed, 7 failed, making the pass rate 66.6%, exactly 1/3.

**Spiff** · June 04, 2006, 10:38 AM

i can only see 20, they conveniently fill an entire page in the chamber at the moment. Counting from the top of the list, the 21st was proposed 04-28-2006, the 20th was proposed 05-01-2006, and the most recent was 05-29-2006

**Tom Paine** · June 04, 2006, 10:40 AM

Spiff, look at the list again. There was a double vote for two clients, apostate and the celt, in one thread. As such the figure is 21, and both passed, meaning 14 passed.

**Hader** · June 04, 2006, 10:41 AM

Hmm, the results are quite similar to that of last month's. There was an overall drop in the number of canidates this month but about the same percentage.

**Marcus Scaurus** · June 04, 2006, 10:41 AM

66.6%?

Must be some kind of message from Lucifer!

So what's with the rejected members? Will they get a second chance in a few weeks/months?

**Spiff** · June 04, 2006, 10:41 AM

Originally Posted by the Grim Squeaker

Spiff, look at the list again. There was a double vote for two clients, apostate and the celt, in one thread. As such the figure is 21, and both passed, meaning 14 passed.

man.. two in one thread.. that is sick and wrong. Thanks for pointing it out ill edit my post.

**Hader** · June 04, 2006, 10:42 AM

They have to wait a month again to be voted on again, that is if some one is willing to try patronizing them again.

**Spiff** · June 04, 2006, 10:47 AM

Yes, by the Patronization Act within the Syntagma it is stated that

Originally Posted by The Syntagma

If a Peregrinus fails his civitates vote he must wait a minimum of one month before being put up for vote again.

However if a candidate failed they are likely to have to demonstrate a noticeable positive change in order to pass where they previously failed.

**the Black Prince** · June 04, 2006, 01:09 PM

a dobule vote for two clients?
does that mean someone proposed 2 clients at the same time?
i only ask because a patron is only allowed to patronise 1 client per moth, according to the patronisation act

**Spiff** · June 04, 2006, 01:12 PM

Yeah two happened at once apparently, though this happened on 05-09-2006, and the revision to the act didnt pass until 05-15-2006, so its all good.

**Tom Paine** · June 04, 2006, 01:15 PM

Originally Posted by the Black Prince

a dobule vote for two clients?
does that mean someone proposed 2 clients at the same time?
i only ask because a patron is only allowed to patronise 1 client per moth, according to the patronisation act

Yes, someone did, as I say apostate and the celt under one patron, and Spiff missed it. Silly Spiff