I'm not doubting that, and no one wants it done away with. The references in the constitution are to be removed. That is all.
Perevel, read the whole thread, then respond. This thread isn't to decide whether or not there is to be a Chancellor, this thread is to decide whether there should still be references to a position that has had nothing to do with the Constitution for a long time, in the Constitution. Furthermore there is no guarantee that anything passed here will somehow automatically be accepted, if you disagree with the proposed changes then disagree with them, don't suddenly move the goalposts and blow the entire thing out of proportion.Originally Posted by Hader