As Hotspur is no longer a Tribune the statement Garb made still stands.
That is a very good literal reading of the posts involved. However, I was trying to be sneaky and insinuate that it seems fishy, planting a seed of doubt into the collective mind of the people. Well, not really, I was actually just trying to teasingly goad Garb into clarifying. That was the object of my post afterall, which was why I addressed the post to him.
Oddly enough I suggested the exact same.
I don't understand what you mean, sorry.
What you said in your initial post, I thought the same last week
Ah okay. Well, I guess you possess all sorts of skills in divination. I am envious, sir.
Do you seriously think I would do something that could be patently demonstrated as self serving and lose my credibility towards the Curia, and for what? In fact it would be much easier to push the amendment through after I had been appointed, stating "my recent experience from the Tribunal", no?
The Amendment was subsequent to a lengthy discussion in Hex, and the sole reason was that both me, Ian and GED are very fond of the Tribunal and we want it as empowered as possible.
No, thank you Garb. I consider myself a decent judge of character (as do most people I imagine) and didn't seriously expect you to do that. I hope you can see how it could look fishy though. Disclosure would have averted this, but I understand why you couldn't say anything until the positions had been announced. Now that you've said this, it doesn't look aquatic at all
One question that I forgot to raise when this was being discussed both the first and second times around, so forgive me for overlooking it, is what happens to the currently serving magistrates? Do they all get to serve out their terms and then this kicks in? Or will their terms be shortened by three months?
Last edited by Jom; February 29, 2012 at 06:47 AM.
I'd prefer that too.
Serve out their terms.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)