Fire and sword or Warband

[Caboose]

Simple which one and why.

[High Flying Dwarf]

Warband is a far superior game imo

[Bolkonsky]

Warband's more polished, complete, and the combat truly shines. WFAS is fun, but consider it an expansion of Warband at most.

[Veliky Kaiser Theos]

I'm the only person who said F&S?

Although I'd say Warband is better with Native Expansion. Although plain native didn't hold my attention long.

[shikaka]

Considering the vanilla games, Fire and Sword is much better and more fun. (I voted WFAS)

However if we consider mods, of course it's warband.


I think WFAS improvements - historical setting, caravan, recruitment, interesting companions - are better to gameplay then warband's (getting a wife, becoming king)

[The_Fan]

Warband. For the Prophecy of Pendor mod of course!

[Raied]

For me F&S, cause the multiplayer is more fun and well balanced (co-op mode), add to that the additional strategic tactics (formation depth, fire with command etc) and the historic setting (real factions), although I perfer middle ages.

[Grymloq]

Warband, it is simply awesome (maybe because it's the first M&B I've played and I loved it)

[Blatta Optima Maxima]

WFAS has a load of new features. Warband has lots of mods. I like 'em both.

[m_1512]

Warband gives options and diverse gameplay experience whereas the other does not.

[wolfbane751]

i liked wfas when i played trial version lol i bought warband and just downloaded mods that added in gunpowder weapons lulz

[Blatta Optima Maxima]

Warband gives options and diverse gameplay experience whereas the other does not.

You don't have to do the storyline, you know.

[penquin11]

Warband is better by far, as I have owned WF&S since its release I must say I was quite displeased. Its graphics (pertinent to it its menu's and ect) are subpar compared to Warbands'.... Furthermore it lacks the modding community

[Lord Willy]

Warband , no way!

[penquin11]

Warband , no way!

Good Sir you clearly have not played the 1257ad mod, the prophesy of pendor mod, or the Brythenwalda mods for Warband!

[Zemdu]

For me F&S, cause the multiplayer is more fun and well balanced (co-op mode), add to that the additional strategic tactics (formation depth, fire with command etc) and the historic setting (real factions), although I perfer middle ages.

dude, all of that can be modded (and allready has) for warband

[Søren]

IMO the M&B battle mechanics are unsuited to the time period of With Fire & Sword, but fit well with the mid medieval setting of the earlier games. Warband captures the feel of it's era, but it's much harder to suspend disbelief that WF&S really resembles the 17th century. Even the mechanic of different armies on the "campaign" map is makes more sense when you see them as the semi-independent feudal forces of different medieval Lords, rather than 17th century military units. It would have been great if they'd increased the content instead, for a start by fleshing out the rather nondescript settlements, and making them more detailed and alive, rather than jumping to a later period that doesn't really fit. M&B is a very good game but to me it still only has the framework of a really great game, so expanding and fleshing out what's already there should have been more a priority.

[money]

warband has all of the mods, you can become king, you can get married; I have never played warband but I own WFAS so I will say that one sine I had more fun playing it than the Original.

[bdd458]

I like both equally.

[Godfrey I of Leuven]

Mehh, I picked Warband because I abhor the use of firearms.