Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Was Julius Caesar the first Roman emperor? [Boustrophedon vs m_1512]

  1. July 28, 2011, 02:15 AM #1
    Boustrophedon
    Boustrophedon is offline
    Boustrophedon's Avatar Grote Smurf
    Citizen
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Posts
    3,158
    Scribe's Quill (Gold) 2011 Member Award Winner

    Default Was Julius Caesar the first Roman emperor? [Boustrophedon vs m_1512]

    I will make my opening statement here either tonight or tomorrow.

    Thesis: Julius Caesar, emperor or first man in Rome?

    I will be defending the notion than Caesar was in fact not an emperor, but merely the first man in Rome. I believe he belongs to the line of First Men like Gaius Marius, M. Aemilius Scaurus, L. Cornelius Sulla instead of the line of emperors, Augustus being the first.

    m_1512 disagrees and will be arguing that he was in fact an emperor
  2. August 06, 2011, 10:00 AM #2
    Darth Red
    Darth Red is offline
    Darth Red's Avatar It's treason, then
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,241
    Novus Moderator's Mace (Amethyst)

    Default Re: Was Julius Caesar the first Roman emperor? [Boustrophedon vs m_1512]

    Is this dead? Should I file this?
    Officially Bottled Awesome™ by Justinian

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules