Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 67

Thread: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

  1. #41
    ToonTotalWar's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    Posts
    1,733

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Just tried this mod today and well done to all involved

  2. #42

  3. #43
    EmperorBatman999's Avatar I say, what, what?
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Why do you want to know?
    Posts
    11,891

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Quote Originally Posted by Don9504 View Post
    And will there be breech loaders, and bolt action riles?
    I don't think repeating rifles existed yet, or atleast in signifcant numbers (they would only come about in the 1860's) And breach-loaders, although existing, I think were almost exclusive to cavalry.

  4. #44
    Primergy's Avatar Protector of the Union
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Augsburg
    Posts
    2,491

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    What about the prussian needle gun? In use since 1848

  5. #45
    Don504's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Was it sold to other countries historically?

    Explore the word and conquer it all.


  6. #46
    Primergy's Avatar Protector of the Union
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Augsburg
    Posts
    2,491

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Of course not, though some made their way to other nations, because of spys which took some during the 1848 revolution.

  7. #47
    Don504's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    I know America had repeating guns in the 1860s but they thought that the gun was too complicated for soldiers to use, and was shadowed by enfield muskets right?

    Explore the word and conquer it all.


  8. #48
    EmperorBatman999's Avatar I say, what, what?
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Why do you want to know?
    Posts
    11,891

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Quote Originally Posted by Don9504 View Post
    I know America had repeating guns in the 1860s but they thought that the gun was too complicated for soldiers to use, and was shadowed by enfield muskets right?
    A few sharpshooters and irregulars used guns like the Henry Repeating Rifle during the war, but yes, line infantry were given Springfield rifled muskets.

    And I didn't know the needle gun came into usage that early.

  9. #49
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    shokh be quick mate.i cannot wait for version 2.

  10. #50

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Well i would but as you may heard - Hinkel had given the ACW mod lead to me.
    So for the next time there will be a patch who fix some the small number of issues and then for the next scenario we have to wait. ACW 3.0 will be the next stage, but then BEIC again in my planing.

  11. #51
    karaislam's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Antalya
    Posts
    2,651

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Quote Originally Posted by shokh View Post
    Well i would but as you may heard - Hinkel had given the ACW mod lead to me.
    So for the next time there will be a patch who fix some the small number of issues and then for the next scenario we have to wait. ACW 3.0 will be the next stage, but then BEIC again in my planing.
    i understood.thank u for quick answer.

  12. #52
    juvenus's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    1,526

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    nice mod! tried it few days ago....looking forward to further development.


  13. #53

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Great project.When will it release?
    Last edited by User_Deleted; August 12, 2011 at 03:15 PM.

  14. #54

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Charge! Nobel Light Brigade. Brave 600.

  15. #55

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Well for the next nearer time, there are no hands free for this project as ACW need all the attention.
    Letīs see after we did this first.

  16. #56

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Hi man love the mod, if you do the Crimean war i will love you guys even more than i do already. ps. how do you give people rep cause i aint got a clue and alot more peeps would be happy if i knew how to Rep.


    SWEET MOD MAN!

  17. #57
    Don504's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    You need 50 posts, and then there will be a little green circle with a white plus in the middle of the lightbulb and report button, that is the rep button

    Explore the word and conquer it all.


  18. #58

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Quote Originally Posted by Don504 View Post
    You need 50 posts, and then there will be a little green circle with a white plus in the middle of the lightbulb and report button, that is the rep button
    Cheers man

  19. #59

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Crimean war and sepoy rebellion sounds like a mini-Victorian age TW
    Legion etrangere in ETW Great work guys
    Last edited by Count von Orlok; August 29, 2012 at 05:24 PM.

  20. #60

    Default Re: Version 2.0 goals and discussion (no Preview)

    Regarding the Crimean War, I'd disinclude Greece from the Russian alliance and make it a swing state. Historically, this was during a time of major schism between the Greeks that favored Russia and the Greeks that looked towards the West, and while the Allies did blockade Piraeus and a handful of Greeks did volunteer for the Russians, the rest were neutral. I would imagine a more likely result would be the Nationality parties (the British, French, and Russian parties) causing a civil war along with the Bavarian royals.

    The others were fairly solid Russian allies/proxies in the Balkans, but the Greeks should be vulnerable to influence from both sides, with anything from a Russian alliance to somebody imitating Cavour.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •