Just a quick question/comment, ive noticed factions such as the Russians and Ottomans have unit numbers in the generic line infantry peaked at 200 just like nearly every other faction. I was under the impression they are to have more men in their regiments to offset their incredibly weak battle skill in nearly every field. Makes sense, Russians fielded 400,000 men as militia easily, seems strange they would have the same number of men per unit that the Prussians or Swedes do (factions famous for the scarcity but quality of their troops). The English have the best line infantry in the game I think and are rightfully offsetted by a missing 20 men per regiment, its been awhile but I believe the Spanish and Portugese have less men in their cavalry units to show that horses wernt in huge quantities around there and they didnt focus much on cavalry. The Russians and Ottomans have always been talked of as having poor troops, but a massive hoard of them to throw at you. The Ottomans are already sevearly handicapped with a worse navy and alot worse quality and quantity of trade-ships. Ive never seen a game in all my playthroughs were the Ottomans wernt just crushed. Austria always makes a nice little empire of itself regardless of me putting pressure on the west or limiting their exapansion by taking towns first. They cleave through the Ottomans destroying them every time. Easy to see why with universaly better troops and more men in the generic line.
It seems pointless to play as the Russians or Ottomans in the current state, all of their units are inferior, yet dont make up for it like they do in vanilla by having more men. Is it intentional to have them at 200? The Austrians have 210 men for the german line and 220 for the Hungarian line. Why shaft the Russians and Ottomans in their gameplay balancer?
PS: Ive always been curious why the Hungarian line is better in every single way than the German line. More men, better stats across the board, yet the Germans were renouned for their dicipline and drill, and the Hungarians their ferocity. Doesnt really come across as a "better trained" vs "more agressive" arrangement like its portraid to be in the unit descriptions. Makes the germans a bit redundant, why bother with them? Hungarians are better in every way