Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678
Results 141 to 157 of 157

Thread: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

  1. #141
    Fingon NL's Avatar Sōkō yumi
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    823

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nimthill View Post
    The Mass Effect weapons are most realistic to me. Essentially, they're mass accelerators (railguns) who fire a tiny shard of metal at the speed of light or higher. (FTL speed is possible due to the mass effect). This gives weapons with virtually unlimited ammo, instantanious travel time and great accuracy. And it's not even that much of a stretch compared to most SciFi weapons.
    Yeah that's why I love it, the ammo is essentially a big block of metal e.d. and if you wanna shoot something the gun shears off the tiniest piece and accelerates it to the speed of light .


    ''Beneath the gold, bitter steel"

  2. #142
    the_mango55's Avatar Reppin the Religious Left
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    18,537

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fingon NL View Post
    Yeah that's why I love it, the ammo is essentially a big block of metal e.d. and if you wanna shoot something the gun shears off the tiniest piece and accelerates it to the speed of light .
    lol it doesn't accelerate it anywhere near the speed of light. Speed of light in Mass Effect can only be achieved by reducing the mass of ships to zero. Zero mass = Zero kinetic energy, so it would be useless.

    The most powerful mass accelerator in the setting are those mounted on dreadnoughts, which fire 20 kg slugs at 1.3% of the speed of light (about 4000 kilometers per second). This shot produces a blast twice as powerful as the Hiroshima nuke, and they can fire every 2 seconds.


    This is actually not that much compared to many other sci-fi, but unlike 95% of them, this weapon is plausible and explainable.
    ttt

    Adopted son of Lord Sephiroth, Youngest sibling of Pent uP Rage, Prarara the Great, Nerwen Carnesîr, TB666 and, Boudicca. In the great Family of the Black Prince

  3. #143
    Turtle Hammer's Avatar Fujisawa
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Bedfordshire, England
    Posts
    1,056

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
    I'm not arguing the effectiveness of the weapons, hellheaven, but the design.
    I understand why Gamesworkshop designs them like that, because lets be frank: Its pretty damn awesome. But if you look into the universe, I can't justify it. THe improvement on tank design theory is natural, tank commanders feed information back about the tank. The companies engineers analyse this information and see how they can improve. Over the thouands of years of use, no tank commnader or enginseer has thought "Hey, if we move the bolters to the front of the tank, we'll ahve more room to make the tank lower, if its lower, its a smaller target?" any some such.

    Although, when I think about it the Landraider may be forgiven. While it has no turrets and can be quite low, it is designed to ferry SpaceMarines/Terminaters around the battlefield, who are quite big themselves, so, now that I have thought about it, the Landraider itself is probably a good design.
    Woah, so you're suggesting the Adeptus Mechanicus don't know what they're doing? That they're... wrong? Until they find an STC construct that says otherwise, tanks are fine. And you're a heretic. Just sit tight, the Ordo Hereticus will be around shortly to discuss your lack of faith in the Emperor's servants...
    Euroba Barbarorum convert

  4. #144
    Gaidin's Avatar Samurai
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,226

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle Hammer View Post
    Woah, so you're suggesting the Adeptus Mechanicus don't know what they're doing? That they're... wrong? Until they find an STC construct that says otherwise, tanks are fine. And you're a heretic. Just sit tight, the Ordo Hereticus will be around shortly to discuss your lack of faith in the Emperor's servants...
    Yes. That's exactly what he's suggesting. You get that a lot when things are designed by the Rule of Cool(TM) instead of actual engineering practicality. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but still.
    One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
    -Neil deGrasse Tyson

    BattleTags
    Guild Wars 2 Tags

  5. #145
    Nimthill's Avatar Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    619

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaidin View Post
    Yes. That's exactly what he's suggesting. You get that a lot when things are designed by the Rule of Cool(TM) instead of actual engineering practicality. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but still.
    "The designer of the gun had clearly not been instructed to beat about the bush. 'Make it evil,' he'd been told. 'Make it totally clear that this gun has a right end and a wrong end. Make it totally clear to anyone standing at the wrong end that things are going badly for them. If that means sticking all sort of spikes and prongs and blackened bits all over it then so be it. This is not a gun for hanging over the fireplace or sticking in the umbrella stand, it is a gun for going out and making people miserable with.'"

    - Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
    For every action there is an equal and opposite government program.

  6. #146
    thatguy's Avatar Banzai jūden-ki
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,496

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Yes, they pretty much have it Turtle, and I am not a heretic for saying the Adeptus Mechanicus are wrong, they themselves dont even worship the emperor

    But Like i said, I understand why the gamesworkshop crew designed them like that, it looks bad-ass.
    Gaidin said it perfectly.

    http://www.battledebate.com/


    Quote Originally Posted by Rapax View Post
    Or perhaps you've been missing the point of modern warfare? Crush the enemy within a month and then fight an insurgency for the next 10 years..
    Quote Originally Posted by spl00ge View Post
    I just got 9 inches.

  7. #147
    Rolling Thunder's Avatar Jukutatsu shita
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,448

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    I decided to not bother buying GW tanks any more and just purchase some Mark IV tanks instead.
    Quote Originally Posted by Denny Crane! View Post
    How about we define the rights that allow a government to say that isn't within my freedom.

  8. #148
    Sanguinary Guardian's Avatar Baitai kihei
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Athens, Hellas
    Posts
    3,377

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rolling Thunder View Post
    I decided to not bother buying GW tanks any more and just purchase some Mark IV tanks instead.
    Good for your wallet!




    H ΕΛΛΑΔΑ κι ο ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ είναι αξίες ιερότερες από οποιαδήποτε ειρήνη!

    Despite all we have lost so far, our fire still burns...

  9. #149
    Bonemarrow's Avatar Yari-hei
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    103

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    I think terminators are fairly efficient compared to modern day weapons

    Give me liberty or give me death.
    -Patrick Henry





  10. #150
    justicar5's Avatar Ninja
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,016

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sanguinary Guardian View Post
    I do know about the Imperial Fleet's abilities, since the Galactic Empire is my favourite faction in the SW mythos. Yes the Emperor did some ed up mistakes, that however does not answer my question. How did the best equipped, trained and professional starfleet in the Galaxy managed to loose against a ragtag band of Rebels converted merchants, with courage making up for their lack of training? The Emperor used battle meditation, fair enough, but even with the destruction of the DS and the Executor, the Imperial Fleet still outnumbered and outgunned the Rebels. Had they followed their training, the Rebel fleet and threat would have been obliterated. No, I don't accept that a trained and professional force lost the stomach to fight a battle they were winning.

    http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Battle_meditation

    In the old days, the Dark Lords of the Sith built meditation chambers in their warships. In the heat of battle, they would seal themselves in the chambers…and direct powerful visualizations upon the conflict that raged all around them."
    ―Odan Urr

    tho interpretations vary as to wether it was palpatine, vader or grand admiral nial declann who was doing the meditation. (And just how hard the KOTR era Jedi or sith would curb stomp the empire era empire or rebels, I lean towards very hard, given the ' actually have a plan, coherant command structure, ideology and military industrial complex' exhibited in the two sides in the KOTOR era, given that both have been in actual total war for over a decade, and given that they run less on rule of cool than later [still do ofc, this being star wars, but the personal force fields and lightsaber resistant armour and melee weapons make a hell of a lot of sense])
    Last edited by justicar5; February 12, 2011 at 03:00 PM.

  11. #151
    squatlover's Avatar Sōkō no yari
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,127

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Vasquez's smart gun in Aliens was probably the least practical weapon to carry and use - serious arm ache - who could carry this thing in a combat ready state for longer than 10 minutes without getting cramp? Looks cool though.

    That's you, drops of water and you're on top of the mountain of success. But one day you start sliding down the mountain and you think wait a minute; I'm a mountain top water drop. I don't belong in this valley, this river, this low dark ocean with all these drops of water. Then one day it gets hot and you slowly evaporate into air, way up, higher than any mountain top, all the way to the heavens.

  12. #152
    paradamed's Avatar Ronin
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Belo Horizonte, Brasil
    Posts
    4,831

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by squatlover View Post
    Vasquez's smart gun in Aliens was probably the least practical weapon to carry and use - serious arm ache - who could carry this thing in a combat ready state for longer than 10 minutes without getting cramp?
    I disagree. This is why there is some kind of hidraulic device attached to the weapon that probably helps distribute the weight and avoid arm tiredness.

  13. #153
    Last Roman's Avatar ron :wub:in swanson
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Minnesota, US
    Posts
    16,687

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sanguinary Guardian View Post
    I do know about the Imperial Fleet's abilities, since the Galactic Empire is my favourite faction in the SW mythos. Yes the Emperor did some ed up mistakes, that however does not answer my question. How did the best equipped, trained and professional starfleet in the Galaxy managed to loose against a ragtag band of Rebels converted merchants, with courage making up for their lack of training? The Emperor used battle meditation, fair enough, but even with the destruction of the DS and the Executor, the Imperial Fleet still outnumbered and outgunned the Rebels. Had they followed their training, the Rebel fleet and threat would have been obliterated. No, I don't accept that a trained and professional force lost the stomach to fight a battle they were winning.
    Why? It's happened in real history before.
    house of Rububula, under the patronage of Nihil, patron of Hotspur, David Deas, Freddie, Askthepizzaguy and Ketchfoop
    Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    -Mark Twain

  14. #154
    Sanguinary Guardian's Avatar Baitai kihei
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Athens, Hellas
    Posts
    3,377

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Last Roman View Post
    Why? It's happened in real history before.
    Well, the opposite has also happened, see the Battle of Lützen.




    H ΕΛΛΑΔΑ κι ο ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ είναι αξίες ιερότερες από οποιαδήποτε ειρήνη!

    Despite all we have lost so far, our fire still burns...

  15. #155
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Daimyo
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Somewhere snowing... This damned holiday...
    Posts
    29,189

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    I believe Darth Sidious wants to know the answer too, just like Emperor of Mankind is questioning why the heck he wanted to teleport into Horus' ship.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vanoi View Post
    The Iraq War was a win. There is a stable government in place.

  16. #156
    Last Roman's Avatar ron :wub:in swanson
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Minnesota, US
    Posts
    16,687

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sanguinary Guardian View Post
    Well, the opposite has also happened, see the Battle of Lützen.
    ok, while true, that's not really the point (the point being that underdog forces have, via various methods, defeated superior ones).
    house of Rububula, under the patronage of Nihil, patron of Hotspur, David Deas, Freddie, Askthepizzaguy and Ketchfoop
    Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company
    -Mark Twain

  17. #157
    Suspended by Request
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Way
    Posts
    7,693

    Default Re: Why are sci-fi weapons worse than modern ones?

    Reason why the "almighty empire" lost: Plot armour and underdog favorisation = bad storytelling. The original Star Wars movies are the most overrated humanly produced item in the world.

    Last edited by Påsan; February 23, 2011 at 08:16 PM.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •