View Poll Results: Do we change the rule?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    16 84.21%
  • No

    2 10.53%
  • Abstain

    1 5.26%
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

  1. #1
    Akar's Avatar Faustian Bargain Maker
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    a 7/11 parking lot with Patron and LaCroix
    Posts
    20,189
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    I propose we do not allow people who sign up here because of their friends telling them about the server to play on said server. This is a server for people who post on TWC because its TWC not because they want to play minecraft on our server. If we dont know these players and cant trust them they should not be allowed to play. What do you guys think? Also could ferrets please sticky this poll?


    People who do not play on the server please do not vote.

  2. #2
    Ascarona's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sexytown
    Posts
    9,156

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Agreed.
    “Never forget what you are, for surely the world will not. Make it your strength. Then it can never be your weakness. Armour yourself in it, and it will never be used to hurt you.”

  3. #3
    Danny_K_1's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    6,723

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    But? My bot?


  4. #4
    The Hedge Knight's Avatar Fierce When Cornered
    Artifex

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,875

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Also it should be pointed out

    -the server has a slot limit ( i suspect)
    -more people= more lag

    Agreed

  5. #5
    Inevitability won
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    9,594

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Disallow anymore non-TWC'ers. And ban the old ones who signed up just for it. Monsters put a hugeeeeeely greater strain on the server. We need as little randomers as possible.

    I support.

  6. #6
    Danny_K_1's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    6,723

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    I do agree however what about the random people who have been in the server a while; Ryan has been there from before the town had more than two buildings and Crazed has been there quite a while to.


  7. #7
    Akar's Avatar Faustian Bargain Maker
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    a 7/11 parking lot with Patron and LaCroix
    Posts
    20,189
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Quote Originally Posted by .Mitch. View Post
    Disallow anymore non-TWC'ers. And ban the old ones who signed up just for it. Monsters put a hugeeeeeely greater strain on the server. We need as little randomers as possible.

    I support.
    Thats going to far IMO. Just disallow the old ones

  8. #8

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Ok, i'll agree to this as long as you add this or soemthing like it to the rule:
    A member can join provided that they have had over 50 posts and have had an account for over 2 weeks.
    Or else its much too vague.

    And ban the old ones who signed up just for it.
    No.
    Developer of The Great War | Leader of WW2: Sandstorm | Under the Woolen Patronage of Mitch | King of All

    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral Van Tromp View Post
    History has always been a bit of the State's slut.

  9. #9
    Stuntdawg5's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    752

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Quote Originally Posted by 'The Hedge Knight View Post
    Also it should be pointed out

    -the server has a slot limit ( i suspect)
    -more people= more lag

    Agreed
    -yes, there is a 20 person slot limit.
    -Until either notch fixes the server, or the server is somehow sped up, I think 8-10 people is max that could be on at once without too much lag. (This is prior to the release of monsters, now it's a bit less)

  10. #10
    crossjon's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,965

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    agreed

  11. #11
    Poach's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    26,766

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Agreed, what are the rules regarding who is a TWCer? I'd up the limit further and make it a month of decent activity. 2 weeks and 50 posts is easy to do.

    A chap called Xelios has been asking me (and others?) for the IP, which I have yet to give to him. This rule is pretty much passed, so I won't give him it.

  12. #12
    Inevitability won
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    9,594

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Same Poach. I just ignored him, he has like 2 posts..

    And I also agree 50 posts and 2 weeks is too low.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Can I suggest we change this to no people who do not have a TWC account and use it to post here?

  14. #14
    Ascarona's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sexytown
    Posts
    9,156

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    Can I suggest we change this to no people who do not have a TWC account and use it to post here?
    Uhm... I don't understand. But the rule change as we're voting on it sounds good enough so I'm gonna say no to this.
    “Never forget what you are, for surely the world will not. Make it your strength. Then it can never be your weakness. Armour yourself in it, and it will never be used to hurt you.”

  15. #15
    nhytgbvfeco2's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    6,444

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    uhh,i guess i agree

  16. #16
    Poach's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    26,766

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Quote Originally Posted by Ascarona View Post
    Uhm... I don't understand. But the rule change as we're voting on it sounds good enough so I'm gonna say no to this.
    I agree with Ferrets, actually. If you look at the new members thread, Akar gave the IP to a guy with 47 posts whose been here since March 2010. I don't regard him as a TWCer yet in 3 posts time he qualifies (though Akar ignored that).

  17. #17
    Poach's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    26,766

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Right, there's confusion kicking about as to this rule.

    As such, I want to have it clarified. I suggest, as a rule of thumb for now:

    To be regarded as a "TWCer" and thus qualify to play on this server, a person must have at least 200 posts.

    Obviously, that doesn't take into account activity, but I can't think of any reasonable qualifier for that. Run on it using common sense: 200 posts in 6 months is ok activity, 200 posts in a year isn't.


    That should work to keep out an influx of newbies for now. We need to agree on a solid rule though.

  18. #18
    Danny_K_1's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    6,723

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Just wondering if this applies to Ryan? Hes been on the server longer than most TWC'ers.


  19. #19
    Poach's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    26,766

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    I think we agreed to let those currently here to stay, though I can't be certain of that.

  20. #20
    Akar's Avatar Faustian Bargain Maker
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    a 7/11 parking lot with Patron and LaCroix
    Posts
    20,189
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Rule proposal: No non-TWC people

    Quote Originally Posted by Poach View Post
    I think we agreed to let those currently here to stay, though I can't be certain of that.
    I agreee, let people who are already here stay here. And I think 200 posts is good.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •