Would you be up for a IH like this? Like hosting a Napolaeiac IH and let players from both sites sign up and form allainces and such? We need a good host for this.
.Org link:
http://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...post2053227740
.Org .vs. TWC IH?
Would you be up for a IH like this? Like hosting a Napolaeiac IH and let players from both sites sign up and form allainces and such? We need a good host for this.
.Org link:
http://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...post2053227740
Dux Limitis
Re: .Org .vs. TWC IH?
You had me at Napoleonic, I'm in.
when the union's inspiration through the worker's blood shall run,
there can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun,
yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one?
but the union makes us strong.
Re: .Org .vs. TWC IH?
I am thinking of testing this with battle of gettysburg. One team could play the Union while the other playing Confederates.The thing is should we have each player as Corps commander with one being the commander in chief, or should the team lead the entire force via democratic decision making?
From Kagemusha at .org. what are you guys thoughts.
Question Everything.
Re: .Org .vs. TWC IH?
Net vs Org would undoubtedly be biased by the host. I highly suggest a mixed game over a versus game.
Though I probably won't be playing.
Roll over the names for quotes
Aristotle || Buddha || Musashi
Posting Permissions
