View Poll Results: Do you wish to change this rule?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    3 20.00%
  • No

    12 80.00%
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

  1. #1

    Default Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Akar has proposed that we change the rule that states you may not build within sight of The City unless. Please vote if you wish to change this rule or keep it. This poll will close on Sunday 7th November.

  2. #2
    Danny_K_1's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    6,723

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    no it would take away from the city.


  3. #3
    Manco's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Curtrycke
    Posts
    15,076

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    No, when portals are working it'd only be a small trouble to set up a second site for vanity buildings.
    Some day I'll actually write all the reviews I keep promising...

  4. #4
    Mangerman's Avatar Only the ladder is real
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    4,401

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Voted no, for reasons already stated.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    I am against changing this rule. The map is eight times the size of planet Earth, and you may build anything you like over the horizon. I think that is very reasonable.

  6. #6
    Jom's Avatar A Place of Greater Safety
    Content Emeritus spy of the council

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    18,495

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Damn, I voted "yes" by mistake. Consider mine a "no" vote please.

    "For what it’s worth: it’s never too late to be whoever you want to be. I hope you live a life you’re proud of, and if you find that you’re not, I hope you have the strength to start all over again."

  7. #7

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Thought I'm not part of the community (though I'm considering joining), I think you should set a definite border for city building limits and a "green zone" between vanity buildings. The city will eventually grow in size with community building projects and the border for where non-city buildings can and can't be built will extend further outward.
    --- Theseus1234
    Suum cique (To each their own) -Motto of the Kingdom of Prussia

    The Crown of Aragon AAR- The Iberian Supremacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Justice and Mercy View Post
    My opinion is 100% objective. That's how I'm so right all the time.
    ^Human hubris knows no bounds.

  8. #8
    Makrell's Avatar The first of all fish
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    10,346

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Quote Originally Posted by Theseus1234 View Post
    Thought I'm not part of the community (though I'm considering joining), I think you should set a definite border for city building limits and a "green zone" between vanity buildings. The city will eventually grow in size with community building projects and the border for where non-city buildings can and can't be built will extend further outward.
    I have also not joined yet, but will soon and i voted no because the city should be dominating in that area

  9. #9
    Petrov's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,919

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Nope. Same reasons everyone else mentioned.

  10. #10
    Akar's Avatar Faustian Bargain Maker
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    a 7/11 parking lot with Patron and LaCroix
    Posts
    20,189
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Quote Originally Posted by ♔ThatCrazedGunman♔ View Post
    Nope. Same reasons everyone else mentioned.
    You dont even play here. Your banned

    Check out the TWC D&D game!
    Message me on Discord (.akar.) for an invite to the Thema Devia Discord
    Daughter, Heir, and Wartime Consigliere of King Athelstan







  11. #11
    Petrov's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,919

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Does that mean I cannot contribute to the community? I want to help, but NO I bet you guys will ban me from the Minecraft forumns altogether.

  12. #12
    Akar's Avatar Faustian Bargain Maker
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    a 7/11 parking lot with Patron and LaCroix
    Posts
    20,189
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Quote Originally Posted by ♔ThatCrazedGunman♔ View Post
    Does that mean I cannot contribute to the community? I want to help, but NO I bet you guys will ban me from the Minecraft forumns altogether.
    Yes, thats correct. We banned you because we dont want you contributing.

    Check out the TWC D&D game!
    Message me on Discord (.akar.) for an invite to the Thema Devia Discord
    Daughter, Heir, and Wartime Consigliere of King Athelstan







  13. #13
    Petrov's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,919

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Fine, well, when you count that up take away one point from 'No'.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    I voted no, thats that mean I can build my floating house/water slide now?







    The discovery of the Higgs boson led to limitless power, the elimination of poverty and Kit-Kats for everyone. It is a communist chocolate hellhole and I'm here to stop it from ever happening. -Eloi Cole
    Quote Originally Posted by HansDuet View Post
    So [Jason] Bourne is an emo.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hookah Smoking Caterpiller View Post
    Japanese developers/publishers have a long history of avoiding development.
    Quote Originally Posted by VOP2288 View Post
    I always thought of Pokemon as glorified cock-fights
    Quote Originally Posted by Nazgûl Killer View Post
    My penis would probably erupt with magma if that happens.



    There is Fail, and then there is Epic Fail. Fail can happen to anyone, no matter how hard you try. An Epic Fail however, requires a mistake so huge that the only reason the opposition can fathom as to why you did it is to think it was deliberate. - Aeros on erepublik

  15. #15
    Nyxos's Avatar when in doubt, doubt.
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow (aka France)
    Posts
    4,227

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Quote Originally Posted by iamme View Post
    I voted no, thats that mean I can build my floating house/water slide now?
    not near the city
    Patronized by Hader.


  16. #16

    Default Re: Change to rule #2: No building within sight of the City itself

    Upon the conclusion of this poll on Sunday this motion was defeated. There will be no building within sight of the city.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •