<a href="http://www.game-advertising-online.com/" target="_blank">Game Advertising Online</a><br /> banner requires iframes
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 198

Thread: SS6.4 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

  1. #101
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Yep, the maximum number of regions (and settlements) is 199.
    Needless to say, all slots are used up.

  2. #102
    Smokey Bacon's Avatar Taihō no heishi
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    546

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Well I don't think there is any regions that can be removed anyway

    So do you not think Kerak should be removed seeing as it wasn't built till 1140ish i think. Montreal was also built after 1100 but before 1140 and the closer the better i guess.
    Last edited by Smokey Bacon; September 21, 2010 at 05:45 AM.

  3. #103
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    al_Karak was an important settlement before the crusader castle was built:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Karak

  4. #104
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Roz, and what's your opinion on my Hamadan suggestion btw?
    Considering that the in-game Seljuks were practically the Hamadani 'branch' of the nation (as I pointed out in post #30), I think it would make sense to replace Kermanshah with the city of Hamadan.
    What's more, it could be even selected as the capital of the Empire.

  5. #105
    Smokey Bacon's Avatar Taihō no heishi
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    546

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Al Karak was an important town but it's the castle represented on the map, which wasn't yet built. Maybe change the name and start it as a town.

    And if more castles are needed then i think Krak des chevaliers definitly should be considered, if only for the late campaign, it was very important in several ways. Also it was a head quaters for the hospitallers so should could be given a knights of st.john guild straight away? And allthough I thought the crusaders captured it after 1100, after a quick google search, I found they captured it in 1099 but then abandoned it until Tancred took over it in 1110. Unfourtunatly I don't have a good argument for Montreal to be included

    Also Aleppo is shown as a castle but really it was a town with a citadel not that there is much to do about that.
    Last edited by Smokey Bacon; September 22, 2010 at 06:35 AM.

  6. #106
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    SB - the whole town / castle division is fairly arbitrary - you can probably make a case for changing a lot of settlements on that basis one way or another.
    Al-Karak deserves its place on the map either way.
    --
    Hamadan / Kermanshah - presumably the same region, just requires moving the town and renaming it.
    shouldn't require any other changes?

    (although we'll need to change all the files that need Kermanshah and replace with Hamadan.)
    as both were important settlements one can make a case for either.
    only real question then becomes is it worth making all the changes?

  7. #107
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozanov View Post
    Hamadan / Kermanshah - presumably the same region, just requires moving the town and renaming it.
    shouldn't require any other changes?

    (although we'll need to change all the files that need Kermanshah and replace with Hamadan.)
    as both were important settlements one can make a case for either.
    only real question then becomes is it worth making all the changes?
    Roz, I think relocating the settlement and renaming it to Hamadan in the output text files will be enough.
    There's no need to change the region ID in my opinion.

  8. #108
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    FP - hopefully CC will see that!

  9. #109
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozanov View Post
    FP - hopefully CC will see that!
    I hope that too, and perhaps he'll also give us some update on the progress soon.

  10. #110
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Thinking about it maybe we should give Hamadan to Seljuks?

    It's simple enough to do in the descr_strat

  11. #111
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozanov View Post
    Thinking about it maybe we should give Hamadan to Seljuks?

    It's simple enough to do in the descr_strat
    Yes, definitely - and as I pointed out a few posts before, it should also be selected as their new capital.

  12. #112
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Roz, I see you also plan to add Targoviste to the Rebels - is this because you want to distinguish the Pecheneg territory from the Cuman lands?
    I'm asking because I took another look at the map and I think I will follow suit in SSHCP, possibly making Baia independent too.

  13. #113
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    yes Targoviste for rebels looks about right for Pechenegs
    - and the Byzantines grab it on turn 2 or thereabouts.

    Baia should be Cuman by 1100 I think (maps can be misleading but it seems about right.)

  14. #114
    Bund weicher Birnen's Avatar Shashu
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    164

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    I can't wait to play this submod!!!
    It really increase the fun of SS when it comes out!! Especially for the Roman Empire

  15. #115
    Caesar Clivus's Avatar SS Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    12,990

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozanov View Post
    FP - hopefully CC will see that!
    Sorry guys my life is rather right now so there hasn't been any progress of late.

    BftB2 UPDATED 22nd DECEMBER. Member of the Complete Byzantine Unit Roster team

  16. #116
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    CC - sorry to hear of your situation.

    hope you can return to the fray in due course when things are more conducive to modding.

  17. #117
    Fair Prince's Avatar Chugen
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,278

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Quote Originally Posted by Caesar Clivus View Post
    Sorry guys my life is rather right now so there hasn't been any progress of late.
    I second Roz's words - let's hope your problems will be gone soon, so you will be able to support us with your fine modding skills.

  18. #118
    Caesar Clivus's Avatar SS Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    12,990

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    So is the final list of all the required/wanted changes still in the first post?

    BftB2 UPDATED 22nd DECEMBER. Member of the Complete Byzantine Unit Roster team

  19. #119
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,712

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    only change I'd make (after game testing) is to give Mosul back to the Turks - would help them a lot!

  20. #120
    Kabe difendā
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    44

    Default Re: Proposal: SS6.3 early era historically more accurate start position (1100)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rozanov View Post
    FP - read your comments after typing this summary :

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    Summary of proposed region changes for Stainless Steel 6.3 early era - 1100

    Faction

    Aragon
    rename Aragon-Navarra
    remove Zaragoza and Barcelona
    add Pamplona (no change to region)

    Byzantium
    remove Durazzo
    add Ragusa (SE part of region to be used for new region)

    Crusader States
    none

    Cumans
    remove Targoviste, Kazan, Bulgar, Yelabuga
    add Azaq, Astrakhan, Oleshe
    rename Astrakhan to Xacitarxan
    merge Jaiksk and Embi regions
    chop NW chunk off of Baia region and add to Halych

    Denmark
    change Lund from town to castle (no change to region)

    Egypt
    rename Luxor castle to Aswan castle (no change to region)

    England
    none

    France
    none

    Genoa
    remove Pisa and Ajaccio (no change to regions)

    HRE
    remove Staufen castle replace with Strasburg city (no change to region)
    move Hamburg port to approx location of Lubeck (on Baltic coast)

    Hungary
    remove Brasov and replace with Gyulafehérvár (no change to region)
    remove Kassa and replace with Eger (no change to region)

    Kievan Rus
    replace Zhitomyr with Vladimir-Volonskii and moved Chernigov, Pereslavl, to more accurate positions.
    relocate Pereslavl

    Khwarezm
    remove Rayy (no change to region)

    Leon
    rename of faction to Leon-Castile
    add Burgos (no change to region)

    Lithuania
    none

    Moors
    rename faction to Murabitim or Almoravids
    rename Seville to Badajoz (no change to region)
    add new Seville region with land taken from Silves and Cordoba
    relocate Granada to north of mountains
    add Lisbon

    Norway
    add Oslo region (no change to region)

    Novgorod
    remove Moscow and Yaroslavl
    add Pskov

    Papal States
    none

    Poland
    add Wroclaw (no change to region)
    remove Halych
    change Plock from town to castle (adjust region to take part of Thorn)

    Portugal
    replace Oporto with Braga (no change to region)

    Scotland
    remove Inverness (no change to region)

    Sicily
    add Bari and Durazzo

    Turks
    remove Tbilisi, Mosul
    replace Qarisiya with Ar-Raggah (possibly adjust region)

    Venice
    remove Ragusa (no change to region)


    Rebels
    add Yelabuga, Kazan, Bulgar, Zaragoza, Barcelona, Rayy, Tbilisi, Mosul, Inverness,
    add Halych (adjust region to give western chunk to Krakow and add NW chunk of Baia to Halych)
    remove Oleshe, Azaq, Astrakhan (to Cumans), Lisbon (to Moors)
    replace Benghazi with Barqa (no change to region)
    replace Moscow with Vladimir (no change to region)
    replace Yaroslavl with Rostov (no change to region)
    replace Bern with Zurich (no change to region)
    replace Thorn with Gdansk (shrink region)
    replace Adana with Sis (no change to region)
    replace Bruges with Ghent (no change to region)
    relocate Smolensk and Polotsk to more accurate locations
    adjust Zagreb region to reach Adriatic Sea
    merge Kazan and Khlynov regions
    create new region from southern sections of Ragusa and Belgrade regions - capital Shkodër.


    "remove Staufen castle replace with Strasburg city (no change to region)"

    more likely the most important town in Swabia would be Augsburg


    "move Hamburg port to approx location of Lubeck (on Baltic coast)"

    no, thats wrong, only the river flows South of Hamburg

    in 1100 Heinrich IV´s son Konrad should be in Italy, he died there 1101 in Florenz (should have 0 loyalty)
    daughter Agnes should be married to Friedrich I von Stauffen (duke in Swabia)
    by 1100 Heinrich IV + Heinrich V should be in the Frankfurt region

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •