Page 2 of 76 FirstFirst 1234567891011122752 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 1501

Thread: Faction speculation thread

  1. #21
    Kajiwara
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    I think those are more like easter eggs that they team left in the game than realistic features.

  2. #22
    Yoshihara
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Balbor View Post
    Why doesn't Syracuse rebel to Epirus? I think Pyrrhus left one of his generals in charge of the city when he left, he was crowned king shortly after that but I'm not sure of the cities relations with Epirus.
    It reverted back to its independence, until the 1st Punic war when Hiero realized that the Romans were more organized than Carthage and more likely to be successful (not to mention the temporary alliance with Carthage was awkward and undesirable because of the history). From then on it became a Roman ally and would not have had relations with Epirus other than trade. In the 2nd Punic war it revolted when Hiero died and the Romans took the city, this is also when Archimedes was killed allegedly as a Roman soldier came in and demanded he hand himself over, and he instead asked for some more paper to finish his work.

    If this was a 4th century mod, then I would say Syracuse should be its own faction. From the start date the chances for growth are less likely, and Syracuse did not last as an independent polity beyond maybe 214 b.c.

  3. #23
    Kajiwara
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    It's not even because of the historical time, adding Syracuse has a faction would be silly. Look at the AI, what would Syracuse DO?

    1- Conquer Sicily, then do nothing else.
    2- Put five levies in a boat and attack Italy, once in the entire game.
    3-Be imediatly destroyed.

  4. #24
    The10thLegion's Avatar Have a good day!
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,834

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Haha very true ^^^

  5. #25
    F-ake's Avatar Sukauto
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    There was no tribe called the Celtiberi AFAIK.
    Yes, sorry i wanted to say Arevaci. And i think the hiverni (or hiberni) would be quiet interesting as a trib in Ireland. they could add challenge for the Pritanoi....
    So i think the new factions (not yet known) will be

    5.Bellovacae or Nervi
    6.Arevaci
    7.Hiverni
    8.Scordisi
    9.Massaesylians

    PS: Sorrybut i don't speak english very well :s
    Last edited by F-ake; August 10, 2010 at 02:00 PM.

  6. #26
    athanaric's Avatar Jukutatsu shita
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,322

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Hibernian tribes are confirmed by various team members not to be in. So you'll have to pick somebody else...

  7. #27
    Senshi
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    1,567

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Balbor View Post
    what about the Arevaci, and there allies?
    Yes they were the main Celtiberian tribe and so would be the logical choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Balbor View Post
    Why doesn't Syracuse rebel to Epirus? I think Pyrrhus left one of his generals in charge of the city when he left, he was crowned king shortly after that but I'm not sure of the cities relations with Epirus.
    It does.

    Galatia revoting to Arverni is also somewhat unrealistic, which is why I'd like to see Galatia as start as a vessel nation, could also help trigger some more interesting wars in that region instead of everyone beating on the Seleucid empire .
    Unrealistic, Galatia was not a vassal to anyone at the start date, although I admit the Averni aren't that realistic either but each settlement has to have a founder faction so they are the best choice.


  8. #28
    Shashu
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    175

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    I've played M2TW, Kingdoms, and some of its mods on and off for about three years and haven't observed a definite case of a city changing factions due to unrest. As often as I saw it in RTW, I figured I would have seen it in M2TW by now if it was still possible. So I ask, is this particular feature even in M2TW?

  9. #29
    Moros's Avatar Taihō no heishi
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    592

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
    Yes they were the main Celtiberian tribe and so would be the logical choice.


    It does.

    Unrealistic, Galatia was not a vassal to anyone at the start date, although I admit the Averni aren't that realistic either but each settlement has to have a founder faction so they are the best choice.
    They did have 'some' tribal ties with Arverni tribes however. At least IIRC.


  10. #30
    fightermedic's Avatar Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    711

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    well since Massilia sadly wont be included i'm going to throw in the etruscians or syracuse once more
    more factions for italy!

    the Bastarnae are as good as confirmed by moros -> they most certainly won't be in

    other than that
    well the Belgae, Arevaci Scordisi and Massaesylians would be nice

  11. #31
    Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    620

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by B_Ray View Post
    I've played M2TW, Kingdoms, and some of its mods on and off for about three years and haven't observed a definite case of a city changing factions due to unrest. As often as I saw it in RTW, I figured I would have seen it in M2TW by now if it was still possible. So I ask, is this particular feature even in M2TW?
    I've found in M2TW it's a lot harder to make settlements rebel, castles are almost impossible and you really have to work at it to get a city to do it, something like 3-4 spies & 3-4 assassins to take down every public order building and recruitment building (to stop them adding more to the garrison), even when it get to 20-30% it may take 3-4 turn to rebel. but you're right I, i made Antwerp rebel while the French occupied it and it didn't revert to the HRE.

    Can anyone on the EBII team conform if settlement in M2TW don't revert to there faction creator if the settlement rebels?
    Last edited by Balbor; August 10, 2010 at 08:10 PM. Reason: spelling
    Balbor

    Creative Director
    Head Unit Modeller and Texture
    Fourth Age:Total War

  12. #32
    Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    620

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    TBH settlements always rebelling to rebels would suit me fine, having factions suddenly take possession of a far off settlement is a little unrealistic, especially in a time when independent city-states were common.
    Balbor

    Creative Director
    Head Unit Modeller and Texture
    Fourth Age:Total War

  13. #33
    Shashu
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    175

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    I totally agree, but I think it does make sense for at least a faction's starting provinces (or homeland regions) to be able to rebel to them if they are lost.

  14. #34
    loukas's Avatar Kirā
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Łódź (Poland)
    Posts
    229

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Arevaci - for sure
    Belgae - probably
    Atropatene - not likely but would love to see them
    Western Free Greeks (Syracuse, Massalia, Emporion) - not likely but would love to see them
    Nabataeans - for sure
    Massaesylians - for sure
    Last edited by loukas; August 12, 2010 at 01:11 PM.

    "I fear nothing, I hope for nothing, I am free!"

  15. #35
    fightermedic's Avatar Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    711

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by loukas View Post
    Arevaci - for sure
    Belgae - probably
    Atropatene - not likely but would love to see them
    Western Free Greeks (Syracuse, Massalia, Emporion) - not likely but would love to see them
    Nabataeans - for sure
    Massaesylians - for sure
    wouldn't be so shure about nabata but the semitic culture sure could use one more faction
    atropatene sounds like a good idea

  16. #36
    Foot's Avatar Senshi
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,442

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Balbor View Post
    TBH settlements always rebelling to rebels would suit me fine, having factions suddenly take possession of a far off settlement is a little unrealistic, especially in a time when independent city-states were common.
    we can make all settlements have "slave" as their faction_creator which would then ensure that these settlements rebelled to the slave faction. However, all settlements would have to the same, as the slave faction as only one culture. In EBII the "slave" faction as the western greek culture, and that means that all settlements belonging to the "slave" faction would look like a western greek settlement, whether it be in the vast reaches of the Steppe, or the deserts of Arabia. For aesthetic reasons we have decided not to go this route.

    Foot
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator

  17. #37
    Stephan's Avatar Senshi
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Wien
    Posts
    1,581

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    you people are underestimating the powers of the m2 ai, eg check out the new xai 4.0 and especially this thread
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=333241


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 




    it is also possible to script the ai to invade certain cities so dont rule out syracus just because of the ai

    i read somewhere that the 10 faction slot wont be used (could be wrong there)so that leaves 5 faction slots, id say:
    syracus
    a belgae tribe
    a celtiberian tribe
    meroe (has somebody from the team alredy ruled them out or why is nobody suggesting them?)
    scythia

    Yes, I know that Ishtar is spelled wrong

  18. #38
    Sōkō no yari
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,158

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephan View Post
    meroe (has somebody from the team alredy ruled them out or why is nobody suggesting them?)
    Not enough culture slots.

  19. #39
    Ishiyumi no shashu
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    620

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Foot View Post
    we can make all settlements have "slave" as their faction_creator which would then ensure that these settlements rebelled to the slave faction. However, all settlements would have to the same, as the slave faction as only one culture. In EBII the "slave" faction as the western greek culture, and that means that all settlements belonging to the "slave" faction would look like a western greek settlement, whether it be in the vast reaches of the Steppe, or the deserts of Arabia. For aesthetic reasons we have decided not to go this route.

    Foot
    I think you've misunderstood what we were discussing: in M2TW do captured rebel settlements ever rebel back to the faction_creator? as I don't think I have ever seen it happen. I have made a French controlled settlement with the HRE as its faction_creator rebel but it just turned slave. I remember reading about problems setting the faction_creator to slave in an old EB post somewhere. And i was say that it might not be as bad as it first seems as some settlement unrealistic rebel against there new owner but then suddenly join a faction with is hundreds of miles away such as the western Mediterranean Greek settlements or Galatia.
    Balbor

    Creative Director
    Head Unit Modeller and Texture
    Fourth Age:Total War

  20. #40
    ignoramus maximus's Avatar Supai
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bristol,VA
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: Faction speculation thread

    Have atropatene been ruled out or are they still a possibility?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •