I'm using the EB1 map. They are using the new one with different borders. The old map has a "Nabateae" region which would obviously have belonged to the Kingdom. It was just unnaturally big.
Except, Moros' map shows the Nabata with only a region that roughly approximates Sinai.
The province includes a small part of the region of Nabatea in EBI, but the important parts of
the province (such as the port, city and the like) are colored Eleutheroi.
Last edited by Future Filmmaker; February 09, 2013 at 01:13 PM.
I suppose Massalia would be interesting: a greek enclave in southern gaul. Not quite sure if the were expansionistic, though.
So did Pergamon and Bosporan.
I don't support Massalia though. Honestly, I don't really support Pergamon either. While yes, they are a rump state of the Attalids, what did they really do in the end but consistently side with others against the Seleukids? Most states in the Asia Minor did. They were at their greatest territorial extent when under Roman hegemony.
I've always liked them for some reason. Might be something to do with parchment thou
Last faction may be an Illyrian faction. That seems the best choice to me for historical importance and filling the map properly.
Sorry if it offends someone, but can someone summarise their historical importance in that period, other than piracy around the end of the republic and Illyrians serving as legionaries extensively during the early empire?
IMO there wont be a illyrian faction, at the mod time frame they were basically under pyrrhus ,i'd bet more on a thracian faction.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)