Originally Posted by
Renatus
Thanks. However, so that no-one is misled, I should make it clear that "inviolate city" is Milner's term. What Vegetius actually says (in Milner's translation) is as follows:
Veg. 4 praef.
But the value added to the dispositions of your Clemency by the elaborate construction of walls is demonstrated by Rome, who saved the lives of her citizens through the defences of the Capitoline citadel, to the end that she might later win a more glorious Empire of the whole world.
Veg. 4.9.3
For at the siege of the Capitol, the torsion-engines broke down from continuous and long fatigue after supplies of sinews ran out. But the matrons cut off their hair and presented it to their husbands as they fought, the machines were repaired and they repelled the hostile attack.
Veg. 4.26.5-6
Geese also by their clamour indicate night-attacks with equal skill. For having attacked the Capitoline citadel the Gauls would have destroyed the very name of Rome, had not Mallius been roused by the clamour of the geese to stop them. Marvellous was the watchfulness or good fortune, whereby one bird saved the men destined to send the whole world under the yoke.
These three passages refer to the successful defence of the Capitol against siege by the Gauls in 390 BC and indicate that, to Vegetius, Rome was "inviolate" (to use Milner's word). They would be entirely out of place, if Rome had fallen to siege by the Goths by the time Vegetius was writing. Milner says that they would be "in poor taste", which seems to be an understatement to say the least.