Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

  1. #1
    Acco's Avatar Дијана
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Minsk, Belarus
    Posts
    3,500

    Default What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    I recently read an article which posited that Giuseppe Garibaldi, the red-shirted Italian revolutionary who played a fundamental role in establishing the Kingdom of Italy, had received an offer by President Abraham Lincoln to lead the Union's armies in their conflict versus the Confederacy. Presuming this is true, how do you think the war would have been played out with Garibaldi as the Union's military head?
    На Запад масивно сиви облаци
    Од Исток сонце и вистина излези
    Macedonia

  2. #2
    Ace_General's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicagoland area
    Posts
    7,935

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Do you really think that the U.S. would let their troops be lead by a foreigner, much less a catholic
    Low speed, High Drag

  3. #3
    Pious Agnost's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Whangarei, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,355

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Well he received an offer for it, so that kind of lends credibility to it...

  4. #4
    ★Bandiera Rossa☭'s Avatar The Red Menace
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    6,237

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Garibaldi was an excellent general, so I would expect the union would be in the same or better circumstances as they ended up being in historically.


  5. #5

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace_General View Post
    Do you really think that the U.S. would let their troops be lead by a foreigner, much less a catholic
    Well, the US let a huge portion of their troops be foreigners, even (gasp!) Cathoilcs, so it's hard to say exactly.
    قرطاج يجب ان تدمر

  6. #6
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    And one of our Corps. Commanders was a German.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  7. #7
    conon394's Avatar hoi polloi
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Colfax WA, neat I have a barn and 49 acres - I have 2 horses, 15 chickens - but no more pigs
    Posts
    16,803

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    I not very well versed on Garibaldi but as far as I know he had zero experience with the size of army and scope of operations involved in ACW. Now he does seem to have been competent and as the main commander on the ground of say the Army of the Potomac he might well have lent some needed elan and aggressiveness and is not likely to have always credited the CSA with more men than they had.

    So overall I as far as I know he might not have been a suitable commander in chief of all the Union armies but at least in the East his record suggests he might not have made things so easy for Lee in the first years of the war. But Its hard to thing a foreign 'mercenary' commander would survive a signifact defeat.
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites

    'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'

    But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.

    Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.

  8. #8
    lordoftheT's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tucson Arizona
    Posts
    1,023

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    If I recall I correctly he was offer a high command position by Lincoln but said he would only accept a position a as general of all the armies which was politically unacceptable as having the army commanded by any foreigner would have dealt a massive blow to national prestige.

    That said I think he likely would have made a very capable general for one of the individual armies simply for his drive if nothing else.

  9. #9
    Trax's Avatar It's a conspiracy!
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,044

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    He was also only willing to accept on the condition of immediate abolition of slavery.

    At the outbreak of the American Civil War (in 1861), Garibaldi volunteered his services to President Abraham Lincoln. Garibaldi was offered a Major General's commission in the U. S. Army through the letter from Secretary of State William H. Seward to H. S. Sanford, the U. S. Minister at Brussels, July 17, 1861.[8] On September 18, 1861, Sanford sent the following reply to Seward:

    He [Garibaldi] said that the only way in which he could render service, as he ardently desired to do, to the cause of the United States, was as Commander-in-chief of its forces, that he would only go as such, and with the additional contingent power - to be governed by events - of declaring the abolition of slavery; that he would be of little use without the first, and without the second it would appear like a civil war in which the world at large could have little interest or sympathy.[9]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garibaldi

  10. #10
    Jaketh's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    8,973

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by motiv-8 View Post
    Well, the US let a huge portion of their troops be foreigners, even (gasp!) Cathoilcs, so it's hard to say exactly.
    Irish immigrants fresh off the boats fought each other from both sides

  11. #11

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Damon Wannabe View Post
    And one of our Corps. Commanders was a German.
    There were many Germans, especially as observers, making notes for 1870.

  12. #12

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    To be frank, it would be hard for Garibaldi to do any worse then the initial crop of Union commanders. Though as mentioned before, the ACW was on a completely different scale, and the troubles with communication, intelligence and supply would probably have tested Garibaldi's abilities. McClellan had the same type of magnetic personality and report with the troops, but especially during the Peninsular Campaign McClellan was never able to keep in touch with what was going on so as to really absorb the situation, and so he turtled up despite having the initiative and superior forces.

    It really took a new type of thinking using the military approach of attrition rather than battlefield victory that really turned the Union effort around. Whether Garibaldi would have gotten to that point or not is debatable.

  13. #13
    Ex Tenebris Lux's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,433

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace_General View Post
    Do you really think that the U.S. would let their troops be lead by a foreigner, much less a catholic

    OMG! LOL! Without debating the merits or lack thereof, speaking as an American with a healthy sense of humor and the ability to laugh at himself, this is comedic GOLD!
    I've been here the whole time.

  14. #14
    Ace_General's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicagoland area
    Posts
    7,935

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ex Tenebris Lux View Post
    OMG! LOL! Without debating the merits or lack thereof, speaking as an American with a healthy sense of humor and the ability to laugh at himself, this is comedic GOLD!
    Well, at least it would of made the southerners fight harder by the same token and perhaps there would of been more foreign intervention
    Low speed, High Drag

  15. #15
    Ex Tenebris Lux's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,433

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace_General View Post
    Well, at least it would of made the southerners fight harder by the same token and perhaps there would of been more foreign intervention

    Makes sense... Sadly. Says a lot about our southerners doesn't it? lol
    I've been here the whole time.

  16. #16
    lordoftheT's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tucson Arizona
    Posts
    1,023

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ex Tenebris Lux View Post
    OMG! LOL! Without debating the merits or lack thereof, speaking as an American with a healthy sense of humor and the ability to laugh at himself, this is comedic GOLD!
    Keep in mind that there was a pretty strong anti-catholic moment in America at the time. While there was little issue with appointing foreign born generals theres a major difference in the psychological impact of having a few division and corps commanders who are foreign born and having the commanders of your armies being a foreigner.

  17. #17
    Ex Tenebris Lux's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,433

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by lordoftheT View Post
    Keep in mind that there was a pretty strong anti-catholic moment in America at the time. While there was little issue with appointing foreign born generals theres a major difference in the psychological impact of having a few division and corps commanders who are foreign born and having the commanders of your armies being a foreigner.


    you're preaching to the choir. I was laughing because it was true.
    I've been here the whole time.

  18. #18
    Trax's Avatar It's a conspiracy!
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    6,044

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    What's with all this catholic talk?

    Garibaldi was the mortal enemy of the Papacy after all.

  19. #19
    Ex Tenebris Lux's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,433

    Default Re: What if: Garibaldi took control of the United States' army in the American Civil War?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trax View Post
    What's with all this catholic talk?

    Garibaldi was the mortal enemy of the Papacy after all.

    the point was that your common American circa 1861 wouldn't understand that and would just think "Italian means Catholic."
    I've been here the whole time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •