Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Socket Bayonette and onwards

  1. #1

    Default Socket Bayonette and onwards

    Were there any attempts to improve the socket bayonettes?



    I think that eventually rifles began to be equiped with 'sword bayonettes' at at least around 1900 roughly or a bit earlier.. but were there any efforts in the early 19th centuary to improve the bayonette?



    Were there any instances of 'double' bayonettes as experiaments or anything like this?
    Last edited by ♔ brucedickenson♔; May 03, 2010 at 07:24 PM. Reason: grammar
    Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition

  2. #2

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    actually socket bayonets were considered superior to sword bayonets - sword bayonet was just an attempt how to make a shorter baker rifle as effective in melee as normal musket. but it never was.

  3. #3
    eldaran's Avatar Speshul
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    The United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,143

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    The Bayonet as it stood in the early 19th century has in fact remained essentially unchanged, apart from actually shortening the blade to make it more practical for use in modern situations.



    Under the patronage of the original and the best: Wild Bill Kelso

  4. #4

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    I was wondering if any experiamenting to improve it was undertaken? did anyone manage to make a 'two' pronged bayonette?
    Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition

  5. #5

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    Sword and pike bayonets of different varieties were tried in several armies through the years, and found much less usable.

    Improvements were different kinds of locking mechanisms, as well as different kinds of blades (flat, triangular), different lengths, different kinds of grooves in the socket to make it easier to lock safely etc.

    Why would anyone want a two-pronged bayonet?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    Well, two-pronged bayonets are useless cause they're more expensive, and two holes right through the heart equals one.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    rather ask why did it take so much time to remove pikemen and add bayonets

  8. #8
    EmperorBatman999's Avatar I say, what, what?
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Why do you want to know?
    Posts
    11,891

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    Quote Originally Posted by garudamon11 View Post
    rather ask why did it take so much time to remove pikemen and add bayonets
    Somebody with a small hand decided to put his knife/sword into his musket barrel maybe?

  9. #9
    ♔Mandelus♔'s Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cologne / Germany
    Posts
    1,570

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    Quote Originally Posted by ♔EmperorBatman999♔ View Post
    Somebody with a small hand decided to put his knife/sword into his musket barrel maybe?
    Something like this it was indeed ... during the 30years war when I'm right or sometime later, but I think to remember that Sweden made it first practice.
    The reason why pikemen were deleted to late is simple:
    Musketeers of the age shoot slowly but ther ability to shoot was the important point. Their only danger was cavalry and therefore it was in the eyes more simple to have pikemen.
    Also the this bayonet has as most people know a disadvantage corectly given in ETW: If put inside the musket it was barely impossible to pull it out later during the battle, particularly when the musket shoots several rounds before. The bayonet was so hard inside because the soot and grime inside glued it. So until the ring bayonett was found which allowed to shoot and load with bayonet, the pikemen makes still sense, but only against cavalry.

    Senior Moderator and Staff Member of the large German Totalwar-Zone (over 11.000 members):
    http://www.totalwar-zone.de/forum/in...39807329133e3f

    Death smiles at us all, the only thing you could do is smile back!
    Mark Aurel, Roman General and Emperor

  10. #10
    EmperorBatman999's Avatar I say, what, what?
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Why do you want to know?
    Posts
    11,891

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    And the fact matchlock muskets had to be fired on a fork, so they couldn't be swung around.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Socket Bayonette and onwards

    bayonet is a French invention.. they were first who used it.

    Matchlock musket only needed fork as it was heavier, later model got lighter and didnt need it, but it took some time until fork was abandoned.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •