YES
Not an especially good writing style (particularly the fiction), but looks like he's trying hard, at least.
Yes I have noticed him a few times and almost approached him about citizenship a while back. At that time I didn't think he had done enough. Will look over his contribtions a little closer but I think he will be a yes this time.
I am not sure on this member, he seems to be doing well in the debates but something is still missing for me to really be in favour of his style. His writing style isn't especially good as soren already mentioned but we don't need to be the next roald dahl now do we. I would have liked to see a bit more of his contributions to the Helios though, as for his ToTW / Workshop contributions i don't really see them as something decisive in a presentation.
He is definitely on the right track in becoming a citizen, he has the right attitude and maturity to bring honour to the rank of citizen.
Whit these mixed feelings i will probably voting Yes or Abstain. I will be investigating this case a bit more before pronouncing my final vote.
Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae :
Hesus 's Photo Gallery
The Writers Study|Ex-Global Moderator|Moderation Mentor| Ex - Librarian of the Scriptorium|PoTW|MAARC|ToTW
SPQR Forum Moderator
this could be sig worthy!
I will vote yes based upon his HF efforts.
The other stuff adds, but is clearly not enough without the HF. I do like anybody who helps out in the Graphics area though. What may seem to be a small feat is always appreciated by those of us who cannot do it on our own.
Grandson of Silver Guard, son of Maverick, and father to Mr MM|Rebel6666|Beer Money |bastard stepfather to Ferrets54
The Scriptorium is looking for great articles. Don't be bashful, we can help with the formatting and punctuation. I am only a pm away to you becoming a published author within the best archive of articles around.
Post a challenge and start a debate
Garb's Fight Club - the Challenge thread
.
Originally Posted by Hagar_the_Horrible
What's really the difference between this and the other application? I'm curious... it seems they both have the same amount of contribution... but one is failing, and the other is winning? Oh well, I voted yes on this. A good solid guy.
It seems like all of his Helios links go to 'Buttgate'. Or is it just my subconscious trying to tell me something...? If others are having this problem, here's the corrected links:
The Few, the Proud, the Marines
The Way of the Empty Hand
I didn't link to Buttgate because I assume you've all read it three times by now.
I'm in agreement with Hesus on this one, and Rome also has a point that the recent applications are not dissimilar. Katsumoto is someone I see as being just on the cusp.
On the one hand, I have high standards for Helios editorials because of the work Aden has done there. On the other hand, I think there's an element of honesty in Katsumoto's writing that makes it fall not far shy of that bar. Perhaps more importantly he has shown breadth of focus over a period of only three articles, covering something relevant to TWC, something relevant to his personal experience, and something relevant to the world stage. That's the type of content I could see myself reading regularly, and just in general I'm glad to see the new approach the Helios has taken.
His debate posts are of average expected quality, in respect to my standards for debate at least, if perhaps above average in respect to forum debaters in general. The TotW contributions are fairly supplementary. I do think the Historical Fiction writing is quite good, and hopefully he will continue writing his newest story which seems to not have been updated for a little while. I think it's a case where, if we do vote No now, assuming he continues with the Helios, HF, and occasional debate, he'd certainly be there in two months time.
Having said that, I think it's the composition of his current contributions, their uniqueness and their honesty, which will persuade me to vote Yes a bit preemptively.
House of Ward ~ Patron of Eothese, Mythic_Commodore, Wundai, & Saint Nicholas
Solid yes for his contribution, while a bit concerned when looking at his “insulting others” notes.
Voted yes
Perhaps it is this member's choice to focus contributions. The series of submissions to HF may be the difference. It is an area that has just started up and his efforts there are thus more visible.
Also remember that there can be a fine line between 'now acceptable' and 'not quite there yet'. This can mean the difference between a 10 - 2 tally vs. 2 - 10 tally.
Grandson of Silver Guard, son of Maverick, and father to Mr MM|Rebel6666|Beer Money |bastard stepfather to Ferrets54
The Scriptorium is looking for great articles. Don't be bashful, we can help with the formatting and punctuation. I am only a pm away to you becoming a published author within the best archive of articles around.
Post a challenge and start a debate
Garb's Fight Club - the Challenge thread
.
Originally Posted by Hagar_the_Horrible
I've voted yes as well. His contributions are solid.
Curious Curialist curing the Curia of all things Curial.
I feel moderately confident that this person will be able to contribute in the Curia as he has in TWC so far.
A yes by me, methinks.
PASSED
Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
Civitate,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator
Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
In Patronicum sub Celsius