Actually the possibility to took Moldova from rest of rumenian forces was not important for CP powers as the important lands were already captured in Rumenia. Its clearly show that most of CP armies which were participated in rumenian campaign were transported to other front as it was most important then rumenians who was already defeated.
How many times do i have to say that most of russian army stayed in the front even they was not able to do any offensive operations but hold the flank of rumenian front! That's mean again rumenians didn't stay alone!Yes but the Russian army was pretty much idle in this time and was providing little in the way of effective military support. How many times do I have to say this?
It doesn't mean for You! The rumenians were held up by terrain and A-H forces as its well documented that some of the small A-H border-guard forces fought for the last man like in Orsova!I'm sorry but it doesn't mean jack. The Romanians were held up by the terrain and not because of the resistance offered by the tiny Austro-Hungarian forces in the area. Again this has already been mentioned.
Even the rumenian general said that they retreat was much more faster like advance...
the problem is that Hungarian people's right of self determination was not apply to Hungarians!Again the Bessarabian people's right of self determination or does that only apply to Hungarians?
Attachment 72434
So we can agree that Shcherbachev had no authorization to accept the annexation! right?Shcherbachev was an Imperial Russian commander...and it was the Imperial regime that the Romanians had entered into an alliance with (even though both the Tsarist regime and the Provisional government had been removed by this time). At this time Scherbachev was pretty much cut off by the civil war breaking out in Russia and probably saw the Romanian annexation of keeping Bessarabia out of the hands of the Communists.
Could u give me any battles where Rumenian forces fought against CP armies to liberate Rumenia?Irrelevant...I asked you whether you thought the Romanian forces had no right to liberate the rest of the country they had ceded to the Central Powers in the middle of 1918? But hey this is Romania and not Hungary right snipa!!! Different rules obviously apply.
Again, when CP powers signed the armistice they withdraw from Rumenia without fight! And i think
to say "re-enter" is not correct as the war was already end!
Really? Could u read my posts? I was the first who mentioned that bulgarian CP forces was led by Mackensen and Transylvania CP forces was led by Falken.Again you have avoided my point about Germany being in effective command of all A-H forces in the region at the time of the Romanian entry into the war. Nice example of the Brusilov Offensive snipa...you know where if not for German support the A-H front facing the Russians would've collapsed completely. Added to this where the Russians faced the Germans they faced far stiffer resistance...take a look at the battles around Kowel during the middle of 1916.
I dunno what u mean "where if not for German support the A-H front facing the Russians would've collapsed completely", do u need some event when german forces retreat and A-H forces stayed in the front? As i have a very good collection from WWI A-H operations I can show some when A-H hold the front when Germans retreat...
But it doesnt matter, thats a stupidity what u try to prove that A-H forces didn't do anything and Germany fought alone...
actually what is your issue? that A-H forces didn't fight only Germans?Stop avoiding the issue. Look when the A-H forces launched their own operations, the invasion of Serbia and the operations in Galicia on the Eastern Front during 1914 being two examples, they fared poorly. When they served alongside German forces they performed better...are you getting the pattern?
The 1st invasion of Serbia was failed but what about 2nd? Ahh I know only Mackensen fought alone as
he was the leader of 2 A-H armies...
Because of the poor performance by divisions which were not Austrian or Hungarian (i do not say allA poor excuse offered here also for the overall poor performance offered by the A-H forces during WW1...blame the Slavs and the Romanians!!! German soldiers were deployed to A-H divisions on the Eastern Front during 1916 because of the poor performance offered by all A-H forces in facing the Brusilov Offensive.
minority division were untrustworthy but most of them yes)... As its well documented that even whole brigades deserted where were not Austrians or Hungarians.
Or simply the minorities didn't want to fight for A-H ! I understand this! But can u feel this problem when you are under attack and your own brigades from your flanks deserted to attackers or retreat without fight?I'm not denying that the desertion of the slavic minorities serving within the A-H forces wasn't a problem but this was mainly due to the severe casualties sustained by the multi-lingual junior officer class in the opening year of the war which binded the A-H forces together.
That was the result of an army from a multi-ethnically empire...
Do You know which nations suffered the most casualties from A-H in WW1?