In general I agree with point 1) & 2) with one little correction:
SourceBulgaria did not join the German invasion of the Soviet Union that began on 22 June 1941 nor did it declare war on the Soviet Union.
So there wasn't any Bulgarians on the Eastern Front.
Bulgaria: Total War - Mod For M2TW
Check my Turnovo, custom settlement video preview or download it here
Under the Honorable Patronage of B. Ward
"...We are Bulgarians and and all suffer from one common disease [e.g., the Ottoman rule]" and "Our task is not to shed the blood of Bulgarians, of those who belong to the same people that we serve" - Gotse Delchev, Collective memory, national identity, and ethnic conflict: Greece, Bulgaria, and the Macedonian question, Victor Roudometof, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002, ISBN 0275976483, p. 79.
"The Bulgarians, these are the people, who had everything they wished for. A nation, where the one who buys the nobility with the blood of the enemy receives titles..." - Magnus Felix Ennodius, description of battle at Margus (Morava) river 505 AD
*activates old, younger, nationalist dogukan just for the hell of it*
IT'S THE TURKS!!!! YEAAAAAH
We Turks warriors....every Turk born as a soldier....we have many empires...Gokturks, Huns, Seljuks, Ottomans. Also 70& of the Mongolian army was Turkic.
We conquered very large lands and kept for centuries fighting against many enemies on many fronts.
WE PROUD TURKS also did not do bad in the last century after fall of Ottomans.
Independance war against many big powers....the chages only 5000 Turks(after all we are all the same human beings because we are Turks) made in the Korean war(Kunuri battle)
Half of Cyprus in 4 days
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Svensksund_(1790)Yes. On land... Not so much on the high seas.
I agree with ya there.I'd say the Roman Empire. It saw dozens of large scale wars and countless battles, and won the far majority of them.
That hardly makes up for stuff like:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_%C3%96land
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_K%C3%B8ge_Bay
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronan_(ship)
As well as the numerous defeats against the Russian navy in the GNW, which was created on the spot against the Swedish navy. It's a miserable failure to have 43 three-deckers, 11 000 men at your disposal and good quality equipment yet still fail to stand up to Denmark's navy AND get kicked around by the brand-new Russian navy.
The Swedish navy was much like the French navy in the regard that its officers were usually better off just finding a corner to sit comfortably in rather than cause mayhem by trying to direct their forces. In the Scanian War, the highest naval officer was a man who was as much use as a naval officer as a retarded infant at a marathon. Both of Sweden's greatest flagships in the 17th century were sunk by Sweden, and both times, how to avoid those accidents would make sense to a five year old. Sweden's navy has for the most of its time been a pathetic excuse for a military force.
The Romans also suffered some of the most epic defeats of all time.I'd say the Roman Empire. It saw dozens of large scale wars and countless battles, and won the far majority of them.
قرطاج يجب ان تدمر
um, who had the largest, richest and by far the most powerful empire in history? Britain did. More than a quarter of the globe, the only ultrapower.. ever. Capable of winning large scale battles (Waterloo, El Alemein) as well as holding out against overwhelming hordes (Rorkes Drift). The only reason it doesnt get a lot more credit for beating the Jerries in WW2 is because Yankee Doodle took ALL the credit. And dont even get me started on the Royal Navy.
Basically, the winner of this particular competition is Britain, by far.
.
"Peccavi" or "I have sinned"
Message from British General Charles Napier to the Governor General of India, to inform him of his capture of Sindh, (I Have sinned/Sindh).
I'd put the Spanish over the English empire any day, they owned most if not all of the new world for hundreds of years and found inumerable battles against many foes, achieving outstanding victories. Why aren't they the most succesful, they lost their empire and fell into disarray.
Charlemagne's Empire
French King's conquest (the hardest and numerous victorious wars for little land conquests)
Napoleon's Empire
Colonial Empires
Last edited by Darsh; October 14, 2009 at 02:52 PM.
Légion étrangčre : « Honneur et Fidélité »
That second map isn't making a damn bit of sense to me. (EDIT: Ah, Napoleon, duh.)
And also, French colonial possessions? A ton of desert and disastrous wars against rebellious natives? Yay? FFS, the French even got the Prince Imperial killed in a battle against some Zulus.
Last edited by motiv-8; October 14, 2009 at 02:26 PM.
قرطاج يجب ان تدمر
I'm sorry I missed the part where the Northwest Territories were a Frankish dominion... All in all you are conflating a lot of nominal claims across time and ignoring that say when that claim on N America was maybe valid other parts of that map were not the control of Africa for example.
Last edited by conon394; October 14, 2009 at 02:29 PM.
IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites
'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'
But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.
Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.
I forgot this one:
Légion étrangčre : « Honneur et Fidélité »
I guess you just don't mess with the man (Charlemagne) he conquered places he did not even know existed....
IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites
'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'
But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.
Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.
Darsh - what are you aiming at with the Norman map? I really doubt Roger in Sicily would see himself as a vassal of the Norman kings of England, etc or of anyone for that matter.
IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites
'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'
But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.
Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.
more dickwaving...yaaaay...you suck French!!! No the British suck...loook we did this!!! OMG but we did this....
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge