Historical Battles in Nappie TW

[Lord of the Drunk Penguin]

I sincerely doubt they will dare NOT to stick them in.

[Invictus XII]

They have promised to have all of Napoleon's major battles, well thats what that bloke said in the video review!

[Didz]

Well they would probably be about as accurate as a historical re-enactment event.

[Mr_Fluffy]

Well, Borodino, Leipzig and Waterloo should give my Voodoo 2 card a good workout.

[Panchito]

I do hope that we get more than 2 historical battles.

[Frost, colonel]

Don't worry about it, if they miss them CA can add them, via DLC, and you can pay!

[Knight of Heaven]

Well, Borodino, Leipzig and Waterloo should give my Voodoo 2 card a good workout.

Austerlitz , yeah me also.

[StormTheBreach]

If CA get siege battles right i'd love to see the british storm the french fortress at Ciudad Rodrigo during the Peninsular war

[GeneralL]

All of them ???? Well, there were plenty of mayor battles ....

[LEGIO_Desaix]

Even hundreds battles without a strict distinction between line and column (speed, morale, fast forming square) would be a waste of time.
If we add this poor rendition of square we have atm...well they need to work on basics before committing to scenarios.

[Lord of the Drunk Penguin]

So you want to sacrifice another TW game , making it without historical battle because the devs will waste time introducing a couple of them in this one?
Is that what you're saying?

[Panchito]

So you want to sacrifice another TW game , making it without historical battle because the devs will waste time introducing a couple of them in this one?
Is that what you're saying?

No LEGIO_Desaix means that there are underlaying basic issues that are more important than set-piece battles (that in EW are poorly implemented). I agree with his view.

[Ulan1990]

i hope they will release battles, which are diverse, challenging and also not spread out (like that new battle as france, so irritating to try and pay attention to all fronts)