Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: the 1860's

  1. #1
    'Gunny's Avatar Überrock über alles
    Content Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sunny, sunny Florida
    Posts
    8,367

    Default the 1860's

    in the 1860's and '70s we all know that Germany and Italy were unified. I am, however, having difficulty understanding the tactics employed by the armies. I am inclined to believe that they havent changed too very much since the Napoleonic era, however it seems that tactics would have evolved from marching regiments to a more irregular formation, especially due to invention such as the Needle gun, chassepot, and Breech loading artillery. I am wondering if anyone can point me to a good sight where i can find these things (as all my research has lead just to basic information, rather than actual tactics) The American Civil War seems like a good start, however I also believe the tactics may have been different (and I also seem to fully understand those tactics either, though information is more plentiful)
    I am, in particular, looking for information regardig Prussian, French, and Uastrian tactics during the German Unification. Can anyone help me out?

  2. #2
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: the 1860's

    Franco-Prussian War was largely about how European transfered the experience of American during ACW into an European conflict - that means, it was the strategy change that change the war. Railroad transportation, combined with universal conscription, are the two chief features during that war. Others, in tactical level, was the mobile trench warfare that has been seen using extensively during ACW by both North and South.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  3. #3

    Default Re: the 1860's

    Warfare changed considerably since Napoleonic times by 1870. Weapons were far more accurate and deadly and armies had grown to extremely large sizes. The American Civil War was one of the first cases of this kind of scale, and lead to a lot of problems.
    The first and most notable commander to change warfare was Von Moltke. He witnessed the American Civil War and noted the flaws of commanders, and what they did right. His main problem with it was the command. The old manner of command, in which a commander had almost unchallenged power over his army was failing in the face of front-wide battles and such carnage. Officers had little to no personal initiative, and often blindly followed orders which were already outdated. A single commander trying to run a battle in the smallest details, and lower officers with no power leads to confusion or sluggishness inevitably. Von Moltke had already been reforming the Prussian army to avoid these problems, and the ACW only strenghtened his viewpoint. He turned the Prussian army into one with a decentralized command to achieve efficient centralisation of forces on the field. This allowed the Prussians to avoid bloodbaths like those of the ACW in their campaigns, and continue to wage a mobile war, by outmanouvering their enemies.
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •