Closed.File removed.
Closed.File removed.
Last edited by PSIHOPAT; June 04, 2009 at 03:49 PM.
You're underestimating the melee powers of Elves while overestimating the power of Dwarves and Middle Men...
Make siple test in custom battle in diverse situation(with this modification of curse),and after that i will be hapy to listen your opinion.I sustain "elven archer are deadly in ranged but have no chance in the face of charge cavalery or if they fight in close combat with heavy infantery or even low level infantery" and eriador low level units have great chance to win the battle if they are 2 against one.You're underestimating the melee powers of Elves while overestimating the power of Dwarves and Middle Men...
Of course Middle Men have a good chance to win if they're 2 against 1...
You say "In my opinion Eriador will have best low level units, which can inflict great casualties". That's what I'm arguing.
As for elves not being able to win against heavy infantry, that's just silly.
Damn you Mith, why did you have to reply here? This thread was clean, it was empty, it was silent, it was ignored. It should've stayed that way...
Middle Men have low cost for units and good population grown and can aford huge army.Even one on one low level units from eriador can make an hole in enemy line.They are light shok troops.Elven archer fight well in close combat but canot defeat infantery triple that they are.They are not gods.When one unit fight surounded bi enemy,the rules are changed.Surounded units recivie huge amount of damage from hundred of armed mans and must be extremly resistent to survive and react.Dwarf can fight well surounded,but silvan elfs.....i think not.Elven archer need suport.
Psychopath, both elves and dwarves are best in middleearth when it comes to
close combat, the only thing that makes dwarves better is their heavy armour and strenght.
You gotta stop playing these games that make you believe that the elves live inside trees and their only power is their bows.
I smel some kind of conspiracy.This forum are drived bi dictatorial rules?Ther are meeting of comunist people?I am free to expose mi opinion and i will.Damn you Mith, why did you have to reply here? This thread was clean, it was empty, it was silent, it was ignored. It should've stayed that way...
After you have maked minimum 10 test in custom battle with units who have their atributes chanced i will listen your opinin.In other case NO. You think you know me but i asure u ...NEVER.Arogance its weakness.Psychopath, both elves and dwarves are best in middleearth when it comes to
close combat, the only thing that makes dwarves better is their heavy armour and strenght.
Good god, I cannot deal with this poor, poor excuse for English.
Lol, i always thought in the middle earth universe, elves were considered far superior beings over men, esp in the 1st and 2nd ages. Having both grace, strength and stamina along with many many years of wisdom. Im not an expert however on the LOTR. Hell, i knew more about the elves in D&D. They are portrayed as fragile, agile bowmen.
I took a look at the EDU out of curiosity of how horrible it was and found out that he stole the RC EDU... it has virtually all the same stats with added crap like ap and bp for elven bowmen... and 2 HP for Dwarven warriors... and yet not even for some other dwarven units of the same tier... talk about balance lawl.
Here is some examples:
Dwarven Inconsistency:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Crazy Elven Archers with super arrows of doom:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
And super hobbit archers... with cavalry arrows...
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
And I bet he never even thought to put any credit in there to PB and the others.
Why would someone take a fantastic working mod and actually make it WORSE?
Seriously, can't a mod find some reason to lock these threads. Aside from the comedic value I can't see anything positive coming from this.
I wasn´t expecting anything original, not from one who has written this
after trying to pass up other´s work as his own.
Ugh... This guy is still churning out the rubbish...
WHO GAVE HIM REP!?!??!?!?!?!
1.Dwarven units-Some of them have 2 hp but their number are halved.Exception from the rules make miners(they are just worker),crossbowman(are considered low level units and number of arow are always very important),halberd and pike(halberd are very efective against booth:cavalery and infantery and 2 hp make them unbalanced,pike remain at 1 hp because in the face of charging cavalery,number of pike are always important)
2.Ranged elven units have extreme acurate and lethal arow(they theserve it)but their number has been halved"soldier elf_archer_noldor, 20, 0, 1.2" and encounter serious problem in the face of rain of arrow,exception from this rule make hybrid elven units.Hybrid elven units can be considered auxiliary units because cant hold the line in close combat long time(they are just few),but if they are used rightly can be devastating power.
3.Eriador hunter and hobbits has recivied better ranged power,but their defence has been lowered "stat_pri_armour 1, 1, 0, leather ; defense 5 - 2 skill + 2 agility - 1 hobbit".They can make good job against low armored oponents but are very vulnerabile to missile fire,close combat and cavalery.
One aspect who bother me is "WHI SOME PEOPLE DONT LEAVE ME ALONE" ?I dont want any credits,i dont deserve any credits,i dont want any reputation,I DONT CARE ABOUT THAT.
JuL14n dont insult me...CLEAR?.Dont say me "Psychopath".My Nick name its "PSIHOPAT"
I say again all who are not interested bi this modification can leave this topic.It is very easy.
2D artist for Call of Warhammer TW; 2D artist for Westeros TW; 2D artist and researcher for The Ruins of Arnor TATW sub-mod; 2D artist for Warcraft TW.