Can anyone list which factions were aligned with each other in 1700?
I know they wont have everything historical, but it might be nice to know who i may end up allied with at the start
1700 Alliance's
Can anyone list which factions were aligned with each other in 1700?
I know they wont have everything historical, but it might be nice to know who i may end up allied with at the start
Vicarius Provinciae
Re: 1700 Alliance's
US-France, Britain and Prussia had an alliance against the French, Austrians, and Russians.
Thats all I kno.
Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
— CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
Originally Posted by Dalminar
Re: 1700 Alliance's
The U.S. and France were allied in 1700?
Domesticus
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Those are mid-game alliances during the Seven Years War. In 1700, France and Spain will be allied; Britain, Austria, and The United Provinces will be allied; Denmark-Norway, Poland-Lithuania, and Russia will be allied. These are the historical alliances for the War of the Spanish Succession and the Great Northern War, but I am not sure how closely the game will mirror them. The only sure alliance I am aware of is Britain and The United Provinces, since they share a leader.
Vicarius Provinciae
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Yep during the American Revolution, France is argueably credited with being the reason the US won that war, and had they not been allied there would be no US atm.
However the following years afterward after some really complicated political stuff and the fact the US refused to join the following English-Franco war on the French side among other reasons deteriated the relationship.
Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
— CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
Vicarius
Re: 1700 Alliance's
the question hes asking is that why would the US and Frnace be allied since the US aren't alive at the start of the game.
Minister for Home Affairs of the Commonwealth v Zentai [2012] HCA 28 per Heydon J at [75]
Analysis should not be diverted by reflections upon the zeal with which the victors at the end of the Second World War punished the defeated for war crimes. The victors were animated by the ideals of the Atlantic Charter and of the United Nations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was about to peep over the eastern horizon. But first, they wanted a little hanging.
Semisalis
Re: 1700 Alliance's
That's in 1777, not 1700.
Ordinarius
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Ottoman Empires
-The Barbary States Tunis, Tripoli and Algeria(protector, i saw faction flag in etw files), (since 16th century/Barbaros Hayreddin Pasa)
-Crimean Khanate (protector, i saw faction flag in etw files)
-Morocco (auspices since 1578) (i saw faction flag in etw files)
-Afghanistan (i saw faction flag in etw files)(Always brother)
-Khanate of Khiva (i saw faction flag in etw files http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=222100) and another Turkestan Khanates
-Chechnya (i saw faction flag in etw files)(Always brother
-Sweden(right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1710%E2%80%931711)
-Babur Empire(Mughal_Empire)
-Bangladesh(for Caliphate)
-Singapore (for Caliphate) 1819 lol etw period 1700-1820
-Malaysia(for Caliphate)
-Indonesia (for Caliphate)
-Nijerya(for Caliphate), Cameroon(for Caliphate) and another African factions
for now, i ll update list forthcoming days
Last edited by Nizam; January 30, 2009 at 11:51 PM.
Ottoman Total Overhaul received the 2nd favorite Overhaul/Compilation Mod - 2016 award!
by_TotalWarTurkiye
Re: 1700 Alliance's
It would be an etremely hollow argument to say that France was THE reason the colonists won the war. They were difiniatly ONE reason, but people who make that argument tend to say France won the war for the colonists.
In fact they did help, but it is possible there would still be a United States today without France's involvment. While it is impossible that the US would exist without the efforts put forth by the colonists.
Basicly France did not win the war, the US won the war with France's help.
That being said I for one am extremely grateful for that help
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
-Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 (C.J.Boyd, Ed., 1950)
Senator
Re: 1700 Alliance's
I would say there is another question to answer before France and U.S. allied. It is does the British win the French & Indian war & then do they loose thier possetions in Canada. Because in history this happened 65 years into the game. Without it there is no situation for an alliance, and plainly stated the French only helped the 13 to stick it to the British. Alliances changed wildly in europe during this time.
Alliances in America at 1700; French-"Huron" Confederacy, Historically (but I dont know if they are going to) the Brits-Iroquois.
Ducenarius
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Well right on 1701 we had the War of Spanish Sucession which involed the nations of
Holy Roman Empire
Austria
Duchy of Savoy
Great Britain
Dutch Republic
Prussia
Kingdom of Portugal
Against
Kingdom of France
Kingdom of Spain
Electorate of Bavaria
That sorta gives you a rough idea. But then again some of these nations fought together without being allies or sometimes friends. This mainly to do with the so called balance of power the first alliance wanted to keep.
Though the Alliances kept changing constantly during the 18th century really. But one thing is for sure Britain and France wont be friends.
Formerly Tiberias
浪人
Re: 1700 Alliance's
moved to Historical Research Center
Ερωτηθεὶς τι ποτ' αυτώ περιγέγονεν εκ φιλοσοφίας, έφη, «Το ανεπιτάκτως ποιείν ά τινες διά τον από των νόμων φόβον ποιούσιν.
Under the professional guidance of TWC's Zone expert Garbarsardar
Patron of Noble Savage, Dimitri_Harkov, MasterOfThessus, The Fuzz, aja5191, Furin, neoptolemos, AnthoniusII, Legio, agisilaos, Romanos IV, Taiji, Leo, Jom, Jarlaxe
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Indefinitely Banned
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Hm the dutch and the English I guess, since our Willem was on the English throne at that time
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Sweden and Turkey had diplomatic contacts and a common enemy in Russia. However I am not sure if Sweden and Turkey 1710 had agreed to something that can be called an alliance.
An alliance is a treaty between two or more participants and each alliance is in fact unique. The conditions in a treaty of alliance can look quite different to another treaty of alliance, it all depends on the negotiations preceding it.
In 1700 Sweden, Dutch Republic and England had agreed to support each other with troops in case of war.
Maréchal de l'Empire
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Great Northean War - 1700
Saxony 1700-1706 1714-1721
Russia 1700-1721
Danmark 1700-1700 1714-1721
PLC 1701-1721
Courland 1700-1721 (but since 1701 they were under Swedish ocupation)
against
Sweden
Praeses
Re: 1700 Alliance's
Ottomans as far as I know were pretty close to French in the early period...and did have an alliance even earlier.
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
Domesticus
Re: 1700 Alliance's
True, they had an common enemy - the Habsburgs.
France supported the Ottomans with large amounts of money for their (failed) conquest of Vienna 1683
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
