good points you both make, but i disagree with you both.
----
Post your comments on the above captioned debate here. - Senno
Link to Debate Thread.
good points you both make, but i disagree with you both.
----
Post your comments on the above captioned debate here. - Senno
Link to Debate Thread.
Last edited by Senno; November 21, 2008 at 06:35 PM. Reason: Added link to Debate Thread.
I hope that i dont mind me, ill be intruder here. But i would like to say that, if u are talking about great generals, its not important to discuss the political impact of their victories, but to separately observe it from a pure strategical aspect. So , ill agree with my montenegrian brother , that Suvorov was indeed great General and leader.
i think akexander the great has to be the greatest ever. as he conquered lots of the known world in a very short life time.
i also think that hannibal is a great and genius general. but i hate his guts as he almost finished off my beloved roman empire. Scipio africanus ftw.
Love is the most powerful thing on Earth, unless you have access to weaponry.
I must say Alexander the great WAS a great. General.
but Suvorov...:hmmm: I am not sure. he was definately good, maybe amongst the 100 best military commanders ever, but yet not the greatest.
Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius
I agree with Orko, also I have to say that both of them are good but Alexander is in class of his own.
And i get the point about Suleiman the Magnificent.
greatest general, i understand.
thats my point, as a generals what other things they had in their favor?????