I thank both of you for sharing your opinions and I appreciate that you value what I'm writing in this AAR.
Constantius, to be clear about that: I never intended to leave the Legacy unfinished. Incorporating a different point of view is not a bad idea and I have already tried something like that with some ptolemaic characters. I will not exclude the possibility to expand on that.
Dezikeizer, for the sake of thinking this through, allow me to argue against your points.
You fear running two AARs at the same time will make updates sporadic. I don't believe that writing two AARs makes updating overall slower for itself, meaning if you like both AARs you still get the same amount of updates collectively. It may have other reasons if indeed there is a delay. I don't know how that is with Decimus Milo's AARs.
Pointing to patience is a good move, I give you that. But to give the patience some perspective, let me show you some raw numbers. The Legacy has always been and still is designed as a history not of one or two men, but of the seleucid kings and its completion shall be marked by either domination or downfall. By now it is running for about 30 months and covers roughly 25 years of gametime in 50 parts (49 chapters + 1 Intermission) and 103 pages (or 102 if you don't count the chapter I'm working on) in the .odt-file I'm writing it in.
Now, I've been playing the campaign in advance, taking notes and making concepts. At the moment I'm roughly 50 gameyears into the future and I have notes worth of 11 pages in .odt, not to count scribbling paper. So, if I extrapolate on that - up to the point to which I've played, which is not yet the point of completion - you can expect about 100 more chapters over a period of 60 months, which equals 5 years. In five years I'll probably be looking like this:
, perhaps I'll be married, have children and have given up on writing for good.
So, is it really a matter of patience?