signature to support this EXCELENT mod

[Giovi]

i haven't see a tread like this and i want to open one to support the mod

to use the code just copy in the signature edit and add a" [ " to the 1st word" IMG] "

the 1st

IMG]http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/9107/firma1af0.jpg[/IMG]

the second ( i have used the wallpaper in the cd i hope i can use it)

IMG]http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/3594/firma2yb7.jpg[/IMG]

and the classic signature the developers have



the code [CODEIMG]http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/5411/2572619680102262775s600pu3.jpg[/IMG][/CODE]


an other one

IMG]http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6425/firma3am5.jpg[/IMG]

others 2

IMG]http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7785/signatureegyptcopiayk2.jpg[/IMG]

IMG]http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3232/numidasignaturelv9.jpg[/IMG]

IMG]http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/8555/siganurerepublic2gm7.jpg[/IMG]

IMG]http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/4088/republicsignature1xf9.jpg[/IMG]

IMG]http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/1429/spqrcaesarbl4.jpg[/IMG]

IMG]http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/9417/ocatioviussignaturehx9.jpg[/IMG]

others signature from me are coming soon

i hope this can help to support the great mods

[Giovi]

And an other one and i have update the 1st post



any comment are wellcome, for example is the size ok?

[Lou337]

Wow, very very very nice.

[Empedocles]

yes mate! excellent work! I will stick this for some time!

can you change the links so they redirect people to our sub forum instead to imageshak?
can you post the code so people can copy them to their sigs?

regards

[bucellarii]

Hey Giovi!

I'm glad you enjoy the Mod. A lot of hard work went into creating 58 BC and the other FRRE Mods so it is always nice to receive some positive feedback. Good for morale, you know?

By the way, the sigs are great

Hey Empe!

Do you remember the fun I had adding the Developer's Sig? Perhaps I will fare better this time around :hmmm:

[Giovi]

yes mate! excellent work! I will stick this for some time!

can you change the links so they redirect people to our sub forum instead to imageshak?
can you post the code so people can copy them to their sigs?

regards

Now should be fine... but on my signature i put the link for the forum but if i put the url in the code when i copy and past on my signature edit i can't add [ and then the image won't show but without the url everything is fine

can anyone help me?

[Empedocles]

it is working fine now mate. what's the problem?

regards

[Giovi]

it is working fine now mate. what's the problem?

regards

ok nevermind if it's fine i am happy

[Giovi]

and others 2



and

[DaVinci]

Very nice, while i think it could be a bit misleading if other factions are featured in the sigbanners than Caesar's faction, as you know, in 58bc, only Caesar is playable, and everything else makes also no sense along the modding design.

To feature other factions in sigbanners would fit for 77bc, imo.

[Giovi]

Very nice, while i think it could be a bit misleading if other factions are featured in the sigbanners than Caesar's faction, as you know, in 58bc, only Caesar is playable, and everything else makes also no sense along the modding design.

To feature other factions in sigbanners would fit for 77bc, imo.

yes, but ceasar faction is not the only one btw i agree with you maybe caesar against an other factions would be better.....

[Giovi]

and



u meant this?

[DaVinci]

Yes, i just think, if the mod design 58bc features one faction playable, just Caesar, should then also show it in sigbanners, and contrary for 77bc*, where a lot factions are playable can be featured all those factions in sigbanners ... advertisement should always reflect the content and especially the focus of a product.

*whereas also 77bc is a mod focusing on the Roman Republic, and it makes also here more sense to reflect this in advertising sigbanners, imo.

(the whole FRRE mod series plan is original focusing on the historical things around the Romans after the Marian reforms).

[Salvor Hardin]

Agreed. Although I love the Numidian and Egyptian ones

[Iren]

really good work

[Giovi]

an other one



any comments are wellcome

ps updated the 1st post off course

[Octavius Vatco]

I think that should be for 58 BC, cause those legions are Caesar's.

[Giovi]

I think that should be for 58 BC, cause those legions are Caesar's.

I thought i have taken a 77B.C. screenshoot, my bad i will correct it

[Giovi]

Did u mean this?

[Octavius Vatco]

Ok.... dont mind the faction symbol.. its all the same.. Rome....