Map Screens

[sinople]

The map for Europe Total War : Wars of Corruption.

Thanks to King Pietro and sub commander for their work. You will have the same map for the two other campaigns, but I change settlements for this campaign, because the faction list isn't the same

Keep in mind that this map is just a beta, grounds, climates, armies and starting position aren't finished

Map_heights :


map_regions :


In game :

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Starting positions :

[Master Zuma]

insane +rep

[sinople]

It's a beta map, I hadn't integrate them yet

[Son of Mao]

Wow that looks fun to play on + Rep!!

[sinople]

Wow that looks fun to play on + Rep!!

Thanks

[Orko]

Sorry if I insult you but I don't really understand this map...

[sinople]

What don't you understand ?

[Orko]

What don't you understand ?

It is irational and strange and unhistorical. it doesn't make any sence.

[sinople]

irational ? Explain more, I can't understand


unhistorical ? The map is focusing Europe and just Europe, I can't understand how it is unhistorical...

[Nole4694]

It is irational and strange and unhistorical. it doesn't make any sence.

OMG, this is a great map so far probably much more historical and rational than the vanilla map! Good start. Though may be too big for my tastes.

So armies get to walk on water in this mod??(look at your pics)
Look forward to seeing more of this mod

[sinople]

So armies get to walk on water in this mod??(look at your pics)

Yes, I can't understand why CA has not did it for vanilla

[sud commander]

OMG, this is a great map so far probably much more historical and rational than the vanilla map! Good start. Though may be too big for my tastes.

So armies get to walk on water in this mod??(look at your pics)
Look forward to seeing more of this mod

are the "Armies of Christ"

[Arn]

that looks quite good but why is the the name of the Swedish capital Stoccolma and not Stockholm??:hmmm:

[Y-M4N]

It is irational and strange and unhistorical. it doesn't make any sence.

I know this is a beta map, but I agree with this guy. My main question is what the heck made you decide to flood the low countries like that? The two cities you gave them are very far from their actual location, even by game standards. Leeuwarden seems an odd city to include.

[sinople]

Just because, the gameplay in the mod is as important as the history.

But I use googlemaps for Leeuwarden, I don't think I did a error ?

[hekk]

Its a nice map, though it would be great if the map was expanded up north to Nidaros(which was the capital of Norway), this would represent Norway's economy and power alot better.

You should change Stavanger to Stafangr, Oslo to Ásló and Skien to Skiða. These names are in Old Norse and are more accurate.

The cities Kristiansand, Fredrikstadt and Stockholm did not exist at this time at all.

I'd suggest replacing Fredrikstadt with Konghelle (region should be called Bagahuslán) which would should be represented as castle. Stockholm should be replace with with Upsala (Also this should be the only city Sweden controlls).

Here is a map of medieval Norwegian cities.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[sinople]

Its a nice map, though it would be great if the map was expanded up north to Nidaros(which was the capital of Norway), this would represent Norway's economy and power alot better.

You should change Stavanger to Stafangr, Oslo to Ásló and Skien to Skiða. These names are in Old Norse and are more accurate.

The cities Kristiansand, Fredrikstadt and Stockholm did not exist at this time at all.

I'd suggest replacing Fredrikstadt with Konghelle (region should be called Bagahuslán) which would should be represented as castle. Stockholm should be replace with with Upsala (Also this should be the only city Sweden controlls).

Here is a map of medieval Norwegian cities.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I don't know about extending the map, but I'll change the provinces as you adviced

[Y-M4N]

Just because, the gameplay in the mod is as important as the history.

Could you explain how this improves the gameplay? Because this doesn't seem even remotely related to gameplay. It's just, as Orko said, unhistorical.

But I use googlemaps for Leeuwarden, I don't think I did a error ?

You placed it at least 130 kilometers away from it's actual location, and it's a city that was nowhere near important enough in the middle ages to represent an entire region.

[sinople]

Could you explain how this improves the gameplay? Because this doesn't seem even remotely related to gameplay. It's just, as Orko said, unhistorical.

Just because two settlements for Friesland is better than one.

You placed it at least 130 kilometers away from it's actual location, and it's a city that was nowhere near important enough in the middle ages to represent an entire region.

What do you suggest so ?

[Y-M4N]

Just because two settlements for Friesland is better than one.

That's part of why I mentioned the flooding. On this map, the actual area of Friesland in 1100 is completely covered by water. I just saw the map you're basing this on here, and the size that shows for Friesland makes no sense at all for 1100. This map I've scanned should give you a better idea of the area. Leeuwarden would be under the "F" of Friesland.

What do you suggest so ?

If you want two settlements I'd suggest going with Bruges and the County of Flanders for the south, a very important trade settlement in your period, and Utrecht for the northern part.